Sent from the road while on tour

On Jul 15, 2017 08:25, "Leslie" <geekgirl@gmail.com> wrote:


Sent from the road while on tour

On Jul 15, 2017 05:00, "Malcolm Hutty" <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 14/07/2017 15:03, Leslie wrote:
>
> Do you feel like the Code of Conduct
> https://ripe74.ripe.net/on-site/code-of-conduct/ and
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/ripe-mailing-list-ripe-forum-code-of-conduct
> is not sufficient? What's it lacking?
>

Well it certainly worth a review to see if it's fit for purpose,
especially since it was simply announced without community review.

It has been around for several meetings and printed on the badges for at least the last two meetings, if not more. It's not a secret by any means. 

HPH has also displayed and talked about the code of conduct in his opening remarks at the last several meetings. 




>>
>> I think we should also consider trying to actively survey former
>> community participants who no longer participate, to discover if
>> non-participation was motivated by a previous negative experience
>> (again, prevalence); and also, if not, to discover if there was another
>> identifiable lack that might be remediable.
>>
>
> Giving a survey of people's experiences is a good idea, but not if it
> the purpose is only to say "there's not a problem" as it is very
> difficult (close to impossible) to survey people who have left the
> community and people who don't feel comfortable joining in the first
> place.  There's survivorship bias.

Thank you for your support for the idea.  As I said, the purpose would
be to discover the prevalence of abusive behaviour.

You will also note that I proposed actively surveying former
participants specifically to counter the risk of survivorship bias.

As I mentioned above, that is very difficult. How would you identify and reach out to the people who have left and don't feel comfortable joining? 


>
> Trying to be more inclusive is not disrespecting individuals or
> pandering to demographic statistics.

No, but setting targets for demographic statistics for our community
does constitute such pandering, will inevitably lead to actions that
disrespect individuals (as it prioritises their membership of an
identified group over what they have to contribute) and is, in my
opinion, the opposite of inclusive.



--
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA