- dns-wg - mailman.ripe.net

SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
by zsako＠banknet.net 10 Oct '97

10 Oct '97

Dear all, I would be grateful if someone could tell me what problems could arise by permitting domain names starting with a digit, or even containing *only* digits, under a TLD. I know this is not in accordance with RFC952. My question really is what technical problems could be expected if a TLD were to decide that it allows the above (and currently the required domain name length is only two characters). Thank you for any help on this. Janos Zsako

4 3

minutes from RIPE-27 (Dublin, May 97!) DNS WG session
by Ruediger Volk 28 Sep '97

28 Sep '97

Dear WG members, please find below the minutes with all change requests (all typos) received during RIPE-28 in Amsterdam worked in. This will be considered final after a week comment period (deadline Sunday, October 12th). Ruediger Volk (Draft) Minutes of DNS Working Group Working Group meeting Chair: Ruediger Volk RIPE-27 Wed May 22 1997 1. Adminstrativa scribe: Wilhelm Buehler, de.xlink action items: no open ones minutes of last meeting: no problems reported 2. Reports 2 a) root-server K.root-servers.NET (Carol Orange) - the new root-server is up since last friday (May 16th) - operated by the RIPE-NCC with 24/7 service (RFC 2010) - runs on two industrial PC running BSDI-Unix with a hotswap-disc - only for "."-Zone 2 b ) DNS-Database Referal (Carol Orange and Wilfried Woeber) Aim: User can find authoritative data about domains, without knowing, where it is. Administrators don't have to store the data in multiple databases. new attribute in domain-object : refer: <type> <host> <port> (where type is the style of whois, like RIPE, InterNIC) This looks like a URL, but whois is not a registered protocoll for URL. Carol: "We should register it" How to handle the request forwarding? a) query server with original searchkey; forward response b) return object with referral data (as now) c) send query to server with address of sender to a: + only change to RIPE server - doesn't scale to b: + will scale - significant time to get it working => start with option a) => develop referral aware clients => support a) and b) until server load gets too high The whois-server (RIPE) is performing function + client is using it, determines whehter (a) or (b). - If a adminstrator doesn't want this, put the information in a 'remarks:', not a 'refer:'-line Problem mentioned: - recursive referrals (if other servers offer this too) Action: look on scalability 2 c) NCC In-addr-Tool (Carol Orange alias Maldwyn Morris) Credits: - prev. version: David Kessens - modification done by Maldwyn Morris Reverse delegation is now mostly automated. - checks IP-address, SOA, NS, Zone-data - reachability of servers, UDP-checksum used - comparing with RIPE-Database - ns.ripe.net is requiered fo /16 it's forbidden for /24 - includes assignment-window-check - human hostmaster only approves the request at the end => Improves turn-a-round-time, prevents human errors, scalabilty running since May 6th, in a couple of weeks on the ftp-site (in source) Feature with Keyword 'TEST': all tests will be done, but the request will not be preceeded by RIPE-NCC 2 d) BIND ( Francis Dupont, INRIA) new version 4.95 patch 2 named 8.1 has new configuration file syntax incl. notify-feature (=> SOA requirement out of date?) 2 e) IETF DNSIND WG (no report from Memphis directly) ongoing and going fine - cidr-delegation internet draft (best-current-practice) - dynamic update - security - clarification 3) Activities for the WG - Review recommendations (SOA requirement) - Target of the WG ?

1 0

HELP
by TOMAS_PROKES＠HP-Czechia-om1.om.hp.com 25 Sep '97

25 Sep '97

HELP

1 0

subscribe jpi@herningts.dk
by Jorn Peter Israelsen 13 Aug '97

13 Aug '97

1 0

Power Tool For Webmasters
by powertools＠cybertools.net 29 Jul '97

29 Jul '97

With over 30 million documents on the Web today, and thousands more being added almost hourly, it is now harder than ever for potential customers to find your place on the Net. Which is why we've developed the Web Promotion Spider for Windows 95 / NT . This amazing new software automatically submits your site to over 250 (the list grows daily) major search engines, directories, and Usenet newsgroups! Not only that, The Web Promotion Spider has the ability to dynamically optimize your website, ensuring maximum visibility on the Internet - at the same time recording all registration data in a built in database. Originally engineered for use by the professional advertising industry, this program is easy and intuitive to use. Beginners will be amazed at how simple it is to take complete control over their search engine and index marketing efforts. But don't be fooled by its simplicity! The Web Promotion Spider is an industrial strength marketing tool and an extremely valuable part of any on-line publicity campaign. With this kind of power, it should come as no surprise that many of our customers have built profitable on-line promotional businesses with this product and their existing Internet connection! But don't just take our word for it. The Web Promotion Spider is available now for FREE immediate download on a limited trial basis (shareware). Visit http://www.cybertools.net/spider /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// If you wish to be removed from future mailings, please reply with the subject "Remove" and this software will automatically block you from future mailings. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1 0

Update on gTLD Registrar Application Process
by Robert Shaw 18 Jul '97

18 Jul '97

Hi, There has been an update on the http://www.gtld-mou.org site. As always, for latest news, click on "Latest News" Of specific interest: 1. There is a near-final draft of the "Application Form to Qualify to sign the CORE-MoU Submitted to the Internet Council of Registrars (CORE)" which is available from http://www.gtld-mou.org/docs/apply.htm The application process for applying to become a new gTLD Registrar under the aegis of the gTLD-MoU framework is not yet open. However, the target release date for the final application form is within the next week after which the current application form foresees approximately a 90 day application period (replacing the previously planned 60 day period). Also new is that the application form foresees that CORE will begin "start-up" activities 30 days after the beginning of acceptance of applications. In order to act as a gTLD registrar, the draft application process foresees the following steps: (i) Submit a completed application form and application fee within the application period; (ii) Have the application be deemed acceptable; (iii) After the application has been deemed acceptable, sign the CORE-MoU, and thereby become a member of CORE; (iv) Conform to the operational and technical requirements determined by CORE for registrars; (v) Begin registration activities. After the commencement of registration activities by CORE, only Registrars may remain members of CORE. Registrars, and only Registrars, shall participate in the on-going activities of CORE. Potential gTLD Registrar applicants are encouraged to carefully read the application form. The application form makes reference to the DNS Walk program. The version on the http://www.gtld-mou.org site will be updated with a more robust version before the application process starts. The application form also makes reference to the CORE-MoU. The version on the http://www.gtld-mou.org site will be updated before the application process starts. Robert -- Robert Shaw (shaw(a)itu.int) Advisor, Global Information Infrastructure International Telecommunication Union (http://www.itu.int) Place des Nations, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland

3 3

Is Your Web Site A Secret?
by owl＠owlsnest.com 18 Jul '97

18 Jul '97

Is your web site the best kept secret on the Internet? We'll promote it to 50 search engines and indexes for $85 and complete the job in 2 business days. Satisfaction is guaranteed! If you have a great product, but are not getting many inquiries from your Web site, you may not be adequately listed on the Web's search engines and indexes. Millions of viewers daily use these facilities to find the products and services they are looking for. But if your site is not listed, no one will see it. Listings on most of these services are free. However, locating and filling out the forms required to get a listing can take several days, and most people just don't have the time to do it. That is why we offer a web site promotion service. WHAT'S THE DEAL? We will submit your site to 50 indexes and search engines for $85. We will accept the return of this E-mail, with the form below filled out, as an order. We will bill you upon completion of the promotion. Our terms are net 15 days from date of invoice. Satisfaction guaranteed! HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE? Generally, we complete the submissions within 48 hours of receiving your order. It can take any individual search engine or index up to three weeks to process your submission, although most are much faster. WHAT SEARCH ENGINES AND INDEXES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PROMOTION? The list changes from time to time. This is our current list: Abaweb!, Alta Vista, Been There, BizWeb, Central Source Yellow Pages, Enterpreneurs on the Web, Excite, Four11, Galaxy, I-Network I-Systems Spiral Business Directory, I-World Web Pointer, Infoseek, Inktomi, Innovator's Network Yellow Pages, Internet Mall, Jayde Online Directory, Jumpcity, Jumper Hot Links, Linkmaster, Lycos, Magellan, Mega Mall, Net-Happenings, Net Navigator, Net Mall, NTG's List, NYNEX Big Yellow, One World Plaza, OnLine's WWWeb Index, Rex, Starting Point, Truenorth, URL Tree, Virtual Lynx, Web Point, WebCentral, Web Venture Hotlist, Webcrawler, Websurf, Win Mag/NetGuide Hotspots, WhatUSeek, Worldwide Announce Archive, WWW Business Yellow Pages, World Wide Yellow Pages, WWW Worm, YelloWWWeb. HOW WILL I KNOW THAT YOU HAVE PROMOTED MY SITE? When we have completed the promotion, we will send you an HTML file as an attachment to your E-mail bill. Save this file to your disk, and view it through your Web browser. It provides links to the search engine we submitted your site to, plus any comments we received from them when we did it. ARE THERE ANY GUARANTEES? We do not require prepayment. Your satisfaction is guaranteed or you don't pay the bill. WHO IS OWL'S EYE PRODUCTIONS? We are a web site promotion company located at: Owl's Eye Productions, Inc. 260 E. Main Street Brewster, NY 10509 Phone: (914) 278-4933 Fax: (914) 278-4507 Email: owl(a)owlsnest.com HOW DO I ORDER? The easiest way to order is by e-mail. Just hit the REPLY button on your e-mail program and fill out the following information. (This information will be posted to the search engines/indexes): Your name: Company Name: Address: City: State/Prov: Zip/Postal Code: Telephone: Fax: Email address: URL: http:// Site Title: Description (about 25 words): Key words (maximum of 25, in descending order of importance): Proofs (Where shall we e-mail proofs): If billing a different address, please complete the following: Addressee: Company Name: Address: City: State/Prov: Zip/Postal Code: Telephone: Fax: Email address: We will bill via Email. (7519) Terms: By returning this document via Email, you agree as follows: You have the authority to purchase this service on behalf of your company. Terms are net 15 days. Accounts sent to collections will be liable for collection costs. You agree to protect and indemnify Owl's Eye Productions, Inc. in any claim for libel, copyright violations, plagiarism, or privacy and other suits or claims based on the content or subject matter of your site. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? When we receive your order, we will input the information into our system, and send you a proof. After we process any corrections, we will run your promotion, capturing any comments from search engines as we go. We will incorporate these into an HTML-formatted report to you, which we will attach to your bill. ===Web Promotions=====Press Releases=====Link Exchanges========= Owl's Eye Productions, Inc. 260 E. Main Street Brewster, NY 10509 Ph: 914-278-4933 Fx: 914-278-4507 E-mail: owlseye(a)owlsnest.com

1 0

PAB Re: Update on gTLD Registrar Application Process -Reply
by kconnolly＠evw.com 15 Jul '97

15 Jul '97

Bob Helfant wrote: >>> "bhelfant(a)globecomm.net" 07/15/97 12:21pm >>> Can I assume that between the posting that are considering a 60 or 90 day processing period and this email, you have received overwhelming support for the 90 day period. I didn't see much of it on this list so I can assume that everyone reponded privately. {snip} Online, it's sometimes impossible to tell for sure where the naivete ends and the sarcasm begins. However, we know all too well that the apathy that pervades this list pretty well precludes "overwhelming support" for anything, so it seems safe to conclude that Bob's remarks are sarcastic. I know that there has from time to time been a lack of civility on this list. Lord knows, I have on occasion contributed to that lack. But I am also all too well aware that nothing deters participation in online discussions more conclusively than incivility. The fact that I would just as lief put Jay Fenello's tuchas in the hoosegow does not change the fact that I would enjoy doing so _politely_. So . . . please take this note as a reminder that if we're sincere about striving for the widest possible participation in PAB activities, we should refrain from engaging in sarcasm, character assassination (of PAB Members <seg>) and other unpleasantness. Sincerely, Kevin J. Connolly

1 0

STOP gTLD-MoU
by Ray Davis 13 Jun '97

13 Jun '97

Since the IAHC/iPOC folks keep pointing to their list of signatories as an argument for how much support they have in the Internet community, we felt it fair to offer a list of signatories against the gTLD-MoU: http://www.STOP-gTLD-MoU.org/ If you are against the gTLD-MoU and its implementation, please sign up yourself or your organization. You can do this via the above web site or by email to admin(a)stop-gtld-mou.org. Thanks, Ray

1 0

Re: A proposal about hostcount and DNS
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet 13 Jun '97

13 Jun '97

What we might want to think about is *if* it is useful to come up with some recommendations (RIPE-Document? BCP?) as to the *access* to that ionformation from the sites in the network which perform the tree walk. E.g. things like refusing zone transfers, address filters, and the like. I don't think it's up to RIPE or any other outsider to make any recommendations for a company's or institute's policy regarding access to its nameservers (other than the normal access needed to make the service work for purpose it's meant for). Good point, Piet! When and if there is a need for such activities, I'd propose to leave that to commercial entities. In that case it is extremely likely that the number of sites that close their nameservers for zone transfers will grow immensely. Probably. But then it might be deemed useful to still allow access to the "RIPE Approved" sites doing the walk, and when there is a published document which describes the AUP for the data obtained? Wilfried.

2 1