On 25 May 2016, at 10:50, João Damas <joao@bondis.org> wrote:
Actually Jim, first comes the poll of the community to see if this fits,
Well Joao the community already seems to be heading in that direction. YMMV. That said, it would be helpful for the WG to have a better understanding of the requirements before asking the NCC to investigate.
later comes what you suggest, if the community decides to ask the RIPE NCC to look into it,
Up to a point. Though before the NCC does look into this (or anything else for that matter), I think the NCC should have a sense of what the WG's expectations and objectives are. Unclear requirements help nobody.
or have we become the Ministry of IP?
I have no idea what this Ministry does or why they should interfere in WG matters. :-)