Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair
On Sep 24, 2018, at 13:55, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Hello DNS working group,
The nomination period for the RIPE DNS working group chair selection finished yesterday. We had a single volunteer, Dave Knight.
Dave is clearly the right person for the job, quite aside from also being the only available option :-)
Please offer whatever support (or opposition) you have for Dave on the list.
This is a bit of a strange process. When your choice is reduced to a single well-qualified option, is it not possible just to skip to the end?
Thank you Dave for volunteering!
I would suggest everybody buy him a beer in Amsterdam, but that seems like it would be an awful lot of beer for one person. Joe
Joe, On 2018-09-25 02:01, Joe Abley wrote:
On Sep 24, 2018, at 13:55, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Hello DNS working group,
The nomination period for the RIPE DNS working group chair selection finished yesterday. We had a single volunteer, Dave Knight.
Dave is clearly the right person for the job, quite aside from also being the only available option :-)
[chair hat off] I think so too!
Please offer whatever support (or opposition) you have for Dave on the list.
This is a bit of a strange process. When your choice is reduced to a single well-qualified option, is it not possible just to skip to the end?
[chair hat on] We did not consider the case where only a single volunteer would come forward, nor the case where no volunteers came forward. I know we do not need to be too strict, but I would prefer not to change the selection process in the middle. I do not think that any harm is done by following it. [chair hat off] Even in the case where only a single option is available, allowing the working group to show support reinforces the legitimacy of the volunteer, both to the outside world and to the working group itself. It is quite possible that a candidate could come forward which made working group participants uneasy, and having a chance to say so seems useful to me.
Thank you Dave for volunteering!
I would suggest everybody buy him a beer in Amsterdam, but that seems like it would be an awful lot of beer for one person.
I hear Dave also likes cola, and I think that he is there for DNS OARC/CENTR too, so we can spread the love around in various ways. 😉 Cheers, -- Shane
And, for what is worth, I agree with Shane’s statements Joao
On 25 Sep 2018, at 12:23, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Joe,
On 2018-09-25 02:01, Joe Abley wrote:
On Sep 24, 2018, at 13:55, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Hello DNS working group,
The nomination period for the RIPE DNS working group chair selection finished yesterday. We had a single volunteer, Dave Knight. Dave is clearly the right person for the job, quite aside from also being the only available option :-)
[chair hat off]
I think so too!
Please offer whatever support (or opposition) you have for Dave on the list. This is a bit of a strange process. When your choice is reduced to a single well-qualified option, is it not possible just to skip to the end?
[chair hat on]
We did not consider the case where only a single volunteer would come forward, nor the case where no volunteers came forward. I know we do not need to be too strict, but I would prefer not to change the selection process in the middle. I do not think that any harm is done by following it.
[chair hat off]
Even in the case where only a single option is available, allowing the working group to show support reinforces the legitimacy of the volunteer, both to the outside world and to the working group itself. It is quite possible that a candidate could come forward which made working group participants uneasy, and having a chance to say so seems useful to me.
Thank you Dave for volunteering! I would suggest everybody buy him a beer in Amsterdam, but that seems like it would be an awful lot of beer for one person.
I hear Dave also likes cola, and I think that he is there for DNS OARC/CENTR too, so we can spread the love around in various ways. 😉
Cheers,
-- Shane
On 25 Sep 2018, at 11:23, Shane Kerr wrote:
Even in the case where only a single option is available, allowing the working group to show support reinforces the legitimacy of the volunteer, both to the outside world and to the working group itself. It is quite possible that a candidate could come forward which made working group participants uneasy, and having a chance to say so seems useful to me.
What I wanted to write, but better written. Niall
participants (4)
-
Joao Damas -
Joe Abley -
Niall O'Reilly -
Shane Kerr