Re: [dns-wg] Fwd: [enum-wg] Tier-2 provisioning: NS vs CNAME/DNAME
"Niall" == Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> writes:
Niall> IMHO such registry systems are not suited to the ENUM Niall> business, and a T1 which takes this approach is unlikely to Niall> be winning many tenders for national infrastructure. Of Niall> course, that depends on the clue-level available to the Niall> local awarding agency. Niall> I'm happy to say that, here in +353-land, our trial T1 is Niall> taking a more helpful approach. Good. The key thing here is you have a trial. So you can try different delegation approaches and see what works and what doesn't. And aside from the DNS mechanics, you can consider things like the impact of a particular approach on interfaces, roles & responsibilities as well as stuff like competition policy and the public interest. IMO it's far more important to learn about these things than focus on which name server(s) some zone sits on.
On 15 Jul 2004, at 14:40, Jim Reid wrote:
So you can try different delegation approaches and see what works and what doesn't. And aside from the DNS mechanics, you can consider things like the impact of a particular approach on interfaces, roles & responsibilities as well as stuff like competition policy and the public interest. IMO it's far more important to learn about these things than focus on which name server(s) some zone sits on.
No dispute there! Best regards, Niall O'Reilly UCD Computing Services
participants (2)
-
Jim Reid -
Niall O'Reilly