I agree, this may also be the time to consider whether the voting process can be done differently/better.


Groet,

Eric




Von:        "Gordon Lennox" <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com>
An:        "IoT WG RIPE" <iot-wg@ripe.net>
Kopie:        "Peter Koch" <pk@DENIC.DE>
Datum:        25-04-2019 09:15
Betreff:        Re: [iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process
Gesendet von:        "iot-wg" <iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net>

---

A pragmatic way forward? I know it is what we tend to expect from Peter. But why not?

Gordon

> On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:
>
> Jim, all,
>
> for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not consensus building.
> In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new chairs anyway,
> and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time offering different
> perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty contest but
> would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter. That would ease the
> onboarding process, as well.
> When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw straws
> (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...).
>
> Regards,
>  Peter


_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg