On 05/26/2011 10:07 AM, Jasper Jans wrote:
Can anyone give me some real world experience with IPv6 numbering on P2P links in their network?
I've seen the recommendations swing from '/64' to '/127 if your equipment can handle it' and even to 'do not assign anything at all just use link-local' and access your devices over the loopback which your IGP will distribute.
The last option seems interesting to me from a IP assignment point of few. It safes me having to allocate a block for this part of the infrastructure. I'm just wondering if in the long run it will not make life harder.
Jasper
Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer
Our ISP is trying to stick with /64 P2P address space. But I've also seen by one of our upstream providers, that they use /112. I don't want to mention them, because their service sucks and the P2P global IPs cannot be pinged, while LL addresses work Us