On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
How do people feel about AGGREGATED-BY-LIR ? Stays in line with the current ones and describes the purpose.
I don't really appreciate the "BY-LIR" thing as there is no requirement (that I know of) for the object to be maintained by a LIR. Section 4.0 of the draft confirms this stating that such a block can be a one level more specific of an ASSIGNED inet6num. The main idea of the draft is that assignation details are maintained out of the RIPE database. I would favor things like: - ASSIGNED-EXTERNAL - ASSIGNED-AGGREGATED - AGGREGATED-BY-ORG But none of them is really good. Is there really a need to have a new status for this kind of assignments? I fail to see any reason why ASSIGNED couldn't be used, all the semantics being carried by the assignment-size attribute. Cheers, -- Bertrand Yvain http://www.IELO.net/