20 Nov
2010
20 Nov
'10
7:21 p.m.
Thanks for commenting. Looking at the tekst you are right that there is some redundancy in the text, but it's not a conflict and it does not create ambiguity. The underlying message stays the same "If you need MPLS, you need RFC 4798".
Procedural I would like to publish as is instead of going into another cycle of editing and last call [...]
[...] I suggest we collect the editorial comments and fix them in a future version.
Ivan, are you ok with this ?
Absolutely (and I totally agree with & support your reasons). Although the two bullets overlap, they do not contradict each other and having them both is not harmful. Let's get this done. Ivan