19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
11:32 a.m.
Hi Gunter,
GV> An issue I see with this policy is that it does not support pro-active address planning for the longer term and may end up in fragmented non-summarizable address space within an organization. Mainly because the newly required address space will be different block and will as result require new address planning policy within the organization itself.
I don't understand your comment. The idea of the policy proposal is to automatically grow the existing /32 to a /29. That results in a single /29 for an ISP. - Sander