10 Apr
2003
10 Apr
'03
3:13 a.m.
Michel Py wrote:
None of these are correct anyway, read:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.tx t
Which is to replace RFC2373 any day now.
Stupid question, but are we still 'allowed' to call the Top Level Aggregators a TLA. Eg... 2001:db8::/32 is a TLA Or is there another more appropriate name for the prefixes that are allowed in the DFZ? Greets, Jeroen