On 5/26/11 8:19 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Nice to hear Cisco has no problems with /127 (now I don't have to test it and blog about it ;)
As for RIPE501bis - I would add RFC 6164 to the list of "optional" RFCs in the "Router requirements" section. Makes sense?
Ivan
RIPE501Bis should imho be focused upon features for 'asking the right IPv6 support'... asking for /127 is silly I think... (btw Cisco IOS device's have no issue with it at all btw... so I am speaking here with my technology hat on).
G/ Hehe, I see you two guys will have a lot to talk about at dinner after v6 summit here in Ljubljana on Thursday :)
ok, there is that draft document requested in RIPE-501, we need to change it to RFC6164 now, when it's published. Thnx for a note :) /jan