Zbynek, The choice for having a NAT64 was to provide a more gentle headstart, since a NAT64 has a strictly bigger set of apps/sites that do work. And, we felt that we should tread lightly - maximize the potential of actually using the v6only as a "business as usual" SSID. The "true IPv6-only" was a DNS server address away: e.g. you could temporarily hardcode the 2001:4860:4860::8888 for the tests, instead of the DNS64 local resolver address. But would be very interesting to hear from the community, what would people think is the most useful option to do ? --a On 5/16/14, Zbynek Pospichal <zbynek@dialtelecom.cz> wrote:
Hi,
I have to say it has been working great, except some trouble with 6->4 translation which was not 100 % for any application. Although thanks for such test...
But, just my two cents: maybe you can use next time IPv6 only network without any translation to show to anyone all the services which are still v4 only.
BR, Zbynek
Dne 16.05.14 11:46, MarcoH napsal(a):
Hello,
First of all let me use this opportunity to say thank you to Andrew Yourtchenko and the RIPE NCC staff for all their support and work in making this available.
Statistics show that again quite a lot of people have used or at least tried this network.
A few issues bubbled up, but they were all related to issues with 3rd party software and one minor incident with the layer 2 infrastructure that was not related to our specific setup.
Please feel free to give feedback about this experiment on this list. But also please consider relaying it back to the developers or companies and compliment with a nice job done or ask them to fix any bugs you may have encountered.
Thanks,
MarcoH