Hi Carlos, On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Carlos Friacas wrote:
Going back to the subject on this message: I think the session was generally positive. Next time perhaps the term "Tutorial" should be dropped... this and the fact it was held from 13:00 to 15:00 on a sunday might have driven people away from it......
I specially did get a bad feeling about the question being raised by the jordan government person: didn't feel he got a proper and clear answer... imho he should have heard IPv6 should be something to have in mind because v4 address exaustion can in fact endanger internet companies' business in jordan (in the same way it will in every other country!) in the medium/long run.
In fact, it's the second time i get the same feeling... once in an ITU IPv6 session someone did a simmilar question and nobody supplied a proper answer too... :-(
I'm blaming myself for not having stepped up to the mike on that moment (despite a small crisis on the event's network i was trying to debug...), but i really hope next time someone speaks out loud why *everybody* should take v6 seriously. :-)
Thanks for your feedback on the session. I know the timing and billing were not perfect. I'm sorry about that. If you add your comments and answer on the session web page (http:// public.icann.org/25mar/tutorial-ipv6), or write a blog on the public participation site it's likely that Mr Fraihat will see your answer there. Thanks, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison