Re: [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
15 Jun
2016
15 Jun
'16
11:59 a.m.
On 15/Jun/16 11:39, Colin Petrie wrote:
We tried this out last year: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-2...
TL;DR - global usefulness of longer-than-/24 is still pretty low.
Thanks, Colin. On my side, I'm not immediately keen to fill FIB slots with >/24 or >/48. But I'll keep an eye on what the rest of the community does and adjust accordingly if it makes sense. Mark.
3070
Age (days ago)
3070
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Mark Tinka