Dear colleagues, One of the main goals of RIPE Atlas is to share information about Internet performance, which we collect via the active measurements performed by the thousands of probes in the RIPE Atlas network. In order to better achieve that goal, last year we suggested making even more of the collected data public. You can read the full details of this proposal on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/proposing-making-ripe-atlas-data-more-pu... We asked for feedback about this proposal from the RIPE Atlas community and, based on that feedback, we have decided not to go ahead with the proposal or make any major changes to the system. We would therefore like to revise our original proposal and suggest the following, revised plan: 1. We will strongly encourage RIPE Atlas users to keep their RIPE Atlas probes public and to perform public measurements as much as possible by: - Making new probes public by default (opt-out available) whenever someone applies for a new probe - Checking the public option by default when using the web interface to create user-defined measurements - Rewarding those who make their probes and measurements public by giving them more credits than those who don’t - Requiring all research enabled by special credits to produce public measurement results - Stressing the public nature of RIPE Atlas as a measurements platform in the RIPE NCC's publications and outreach 2. We will continue to allow users to *not* mark their probes public and to schedule user-defined measurements that are not public. 3. We will improve the documentation in order to clarify exactly what information is available for probes and user-defined measurements that are marked public versus those not marked public. Because this revised plan does not involve making any significant changes to our procedures or interfaces, the implementation would take place during our regular deployment cycle. We are basing this revised plan on the reactions of the 13 RIPE Atlas users who provided feedback after we proposed our original plan (you can find more details about the feedback we received below). We would like to hear from more of you, even if you just confirm that you agree with this revised proposal. Please subscribe to the RIPE Atlas mailing list and let us know what you think: https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas Regards, Vesna Manojlovic Senior Community Builder for Measurements Tools RIPE NCC Summary of the feedback (the original comments can also be found on the RIPE Atlas mailing list archives): Eleven people replied on the mailing list and two replied on RIPE Labs, with some people supporting more than one option. - Three people supported making the data more public - Six people supported keeping things the same (i.e. against removing the "not public" option) - One person suggested making the data less public - Three people suggested delaying the publication of the public results (a new suggestion) - One person was completely neutral Specific comments included: - Making the data public by default is okay, but leave the option to not make it public - If a delay in making the data public is introduced, one-off measurements should be excluded - A delay in making the data public will introduce more complexity to the system - A proposal to receive extra/fewer credits for making probes and measurements public/not public, respectively