Re: [mat-wg] [routing-wg] Fwd: [ARIN-consult] Consultation on New Experimental Allocation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/08/14 12:51, Job Snijders wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:38:17PM +0200, Emile Aben wrote:
I'd like to inform you of an experiment we propose doing together with ARIN about the routability of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs 23.128.0.0/10 block. For more details see ARIN's announcement below.
If people have any feedback on this, please let us know.
I recommend testing with and without proper route: objects for the small prefixes.
As a service provider I would accept smaller than /24... If and only if there is an exact route object for the prefix, other providers just discard anything smaller than a /24, regardless of the existance of proper route objects. Would be good to quantify this.
We plan to start announcing a couple of prefixes from AS12654 within the next hour for the purpose of reachability checking of prefixes longer than /24 out of ARINs 23.128.0.0/10 block: With route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.24.0/24 23.128.24.1 23.128.25.0/25 23.128.25.1 23.128.25.240/28 23.128.25.241 Without route object: prefix pingable IP 23.128.124.0/24 23.128.124.1 23.128.125.0/25 23.128.125.1 23.128.125.240/28 23.128.125.241 best regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJULRhIAAoJEKxthF6wloMOuR4QAJys9r18hwmu8DsF2nr6mCje wjYoKcJP/AAl0vQpQLMhR70D9b9v5XQArcMyvzoXRqcFYTfz5yAy9rsOD1pWOE8r dz/XmTzp45fmTRBMbCgQNVA4FLhv0Iq9Qx2eVSWhgLGSTNRNM9oGUTOVvzaIZ551 hx0+dbexz6AO9LlHeeam+rulHsIrsXXeMHhuLz1yU/MkW+MEyadJPQqLpMjIvCBs 4ENPDe358J4SQVMi7Ur55mXaF8vCJ4lP9CXCzcSvEa+S+iuoN9+xrDC6+QPHPj8k 1ZWiSN903ESQBcTG+uX69GH0qHCD/ADYswL705GEayRhXh0VlCdUwkfBCZdYKRn/ KB5hvJ+xkXIA+2mlBJYuJDWs3WB9xZ4ijID6hEbyqfiX1TqNQy0qPPS5HWrkeZg6 UCVBDFvZnn39z7BOSNLvf3bSc1VWK2AikS+6pzyyd8i4Pdk7GVPxFnsHdfEwkRJz n7h0Vjn7MOrnS6Fy29dJ1E+HC3PlN+W1hE9j4vO3sGrKHEc9tIW9MZ8Wg35qKi5c oUp9wylYhkjl3YKHxtc4bUXwzQqdYa7sxXPKIX5yfYLa+0mIdnQgWqK2Rzd+/rAa JfNPCrgJkxUrd8Gut6OkaV5EhgojYfvrGe3qfZj9OvhG4SQcDjbTW24rdySjtMJS mADNKNND94MRp43ehre3 =bh0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear colleagues, We've published a RIPE Labs article with initial analysis results of announcing longer-than-/24 IPv4 prefixes: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-p... Spoiler: the longer-than-/24 prefixes are not very visible/reachable. Having route-objects improves visibility/reachability, but only a little bit. cheers, Emile Aben RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUMqX3AAoJEKxthF6wloMOwOYP/jqpzNrLw2CjVQcQmL42+QqY QT2Dps5yKmQ5Sl/4QQuvmO+7/iexfcUsW/I8wmDwXqtr/m076urhifsIuxI6hzuK C7fwVga9kfmpri2LhyXIssxN5KtDsbsSVdoSqg6FCbtAlh1TpNqG9k1BDOEffRU8 cAtGs3fEU1ln++nRtmsXZMNkai/JNqZ/y1Xc8Cs8+5xX/ItQq8aQURsa+23AH2LP /uNzkQ2dU3tESVSu/7+qCzttXqmmwVTpxjHbDcgyW/B7hUy2paBBlOQ2jRUmcPZG YBWQXfkAOq9DDBjEMeHBKKgxRdm1Y47A7L4h4HFVPp67tM+aK6H4xagkvq1B/shn KSMR11fNZlIxmhpiKeDY8/GUoG3uUlggor0u3gWXvs8JaMo61QDOqZm+LOaxj2b4 YYjiLiykw2MnsvMcZ6aX75NIYmFje2jXtGxiTNMl3w8C1y7wHwRg1FiW/vfz2B4b /xhIvB/byAn+YEk4aytBs8s9QarvCvqUY4+mtss2N76Yc7RzVoIrGcHlBPINiJP5 yp7eH1FKSU54l5eKIWeiFC4ulu4FIhg9RPG06YfC3Cwu7Y9AtR1XPkO8VOr5hTji 4+Ku7X9wAbIaAEntGoJ9r79NU5/jo1njvs7bNwnBWNQ0Qu23sPCTJPLL6kuPSQ8A 3oZo7ZWRzIEkIiGCyfO2 =zRhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
Emile Aben