Begin forwarded message:
Hi Luuk,
(As chair, running the consensus process) No, there is no reason not to go with three co-chairs for the next term; indeed (as a chair, stepping down, who has had fun with meeting logistics, and is an SRE at $dayjob) three chairs would in some ways be preferable, as it gives n+1 chair redundancy in addition to a breadth of perspective on measurement topics.
Cheers,
Brian
On 4 Apr 2022, at 09:55, Luuk Hendriks <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue 29 Mar 2022, 20:48, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
The call for interested parties is now closed. Thank you to our candidates (in order of received statement of interest):
- Massimo Candela - Stephen Strowes - Nina Bargisen
This opens the call for discussion on the candidates; the current chairs will call consensus on 12 April.
Without a doubt both Massimo and Stephen are great candidates for new co-chairs. Perhaps this was discussed before, but is there a reason to not go with three co-chairs for the next term(s)?
luuk
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/mat-wg
Hi Brian, all, On Mon 4 Apr 2022, 12:00, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
(As chair, running the consensus process) No, there is no reason not to go with three co-chairs for the next term; indeed (as a chair, stepping down, who has had fun with meeting logistics, and is an SRE at $dayjob) three chairs would in some ways be preferable, as it gives n+1 chair redundancy in addition to a breadth of perspective on measurement topics.
Agreed, especially on your last point. And in that case (just to be explicit): +1 for both Massimo and Stephen. Thanks, luuk
participants (2)
-
Brian Trammell (RIPE) -
Luuk Hendriks