15 Mar
2013
15 Mar
'13
9:10 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Rob Evans <rhe@nosc.ja.net> wrote:
Whilst understanding the limits and overheads of rsync, I'd have thought there is enough experience of the software within the NCC (think RPKI) to be able to set up an rsync server for the documents fairly trivially.
There are several different technologies which provide some or all of the features git offers. Yet, the package as a whole is unmatched, imo. I am well aware that this is the weakest of all proposals as it specifies a specific piece of software that should be used. I still think it would be a Very Good Thing, but if this one fails and the others come through, I will be happy. -- Richard