I think  also that it is a bad idea  to let a LIR push the Transfer Lock button on behalf of PI holders.

On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 21:47, Max Tulyev <maxtul@netassist.ua> wrote:

03.06.23 18:44, Михайло Кононихін пише:
> There are 24 mentions of the phrase "resource holder". Doesn't it mean
> any resource holder, not just LIRs? I believe it includes organizations
> with PI.

I agree.
But I don't see the way how it (will be) implemented technically.

I think let LIRs be able to push the button for PI holders is a bad idea.

 

>
> BTW, PI resources are easier to protect: you can transfer them to any
> organization, don't need LIR. Transfer locks for 2 years.
>
Yes, a bit easier. You don't need a LIR for receiving company.

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ncc-services-wg