Hi Sander, On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:44:24PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
I didn't really expect everyone to agree to the current text. But I did not expect such language and comparisons on this list, and it shocked me. As one of the proposers I ask you to please participate in a constructive discussion here to see what is possible and desirable and what is not.
if you were under the impression I was attacking you personally, I apologize, that was not my intent. I am quite alarmed by the proposal though, and I don't think my comparisons are that off either, considering the area of resource management having become a lot more competitive, as opposed to, co-operative since ipv4 depletion. as for what is possible, I've thought more on it and have formend the opinion that the only thing out of it, I could accept, is publication of the fects if a complaint was upheld *and* resources removed for cause. The reason being that RIPE policy is often ambiguous and contradictory, so a policy violation might simply be the result of a mis-interpretation, difference of opinion or bureaucratic slip-up. Dragging that into the court of public opinion serves nobody, except perhaps a malicious complainant. cheers, Sascha Luck
Thank you, Sander