I understand that  some of us are vary passionate about the RIPE "new comers" and always are trying to help them in any possible way.

But I cannot see any reason why NCC members should pay for a ripe archivist at this stage as the demand for digging old discussions is not really high, and the outcome of having an archivist somehow is very limited. (cost/benefit?)

Some volunteers can get involved for now and if later we could see a higher demand or need more resources, we can always ask NCC for a RIPE archivist.

Regards,

Arash

 

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:32:23PM +0430, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> -1,
>
> It doesn't make  sense to me at this stage.

Why, exactly?  In Address-Policy, for example, many of the current policies
go back to discussions we had years and years ago.  So having more easily
accessible archives of "old discussions" would help newcomers to understand
better why things evolved the way they did...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279