On 30 Aug 2012, at 11:00, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Therefore, I think I agree with what Daniel Karrenberg said about what the present discussion should be about, I'm quoting:
So what we have to decide as a community is: under which policies does the RIPE community allow legacy space holders to register their address space in the RIPE Internet Number registry. Nothing more, nothing less.
All other questions are secondary. Resolving conflicts about the holdership/use of the address space is a non issue. Past agreements about allocation of address space are a non issue. [...]
(I have a question of terminology that I'll bring up in a separate message.)
I think I agree too. Background work on a new version of the policy proposal has begun. It is premature for me to say more at this stage. Best regards, Niall