On 04/02/2013 09:02, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Which we will. We are trying to create a policy/framework to regulate NCC services in regards to LRH - which does not exist today.
The question everyone needs to answer is "is what has so far been sent better than no policy?" Do you support the general direction we are going in, ignoring the nits which can easily be fixed?
The general direction is great and I think this update to the proposal is a huge improvement on v1.0, but do not support the policy proposal as it stands because it still has critical problems. The most important of these problems is a discussion / decision about what to do with registration services for legacy resource holders / legacy resources who do not engage with the RIPE NCC. There are other serious problems with the proposal too, and a couple of nits which are easily fixable. Nick