Re: [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
The draft document for version 4.0 of the policy proposal 2012-07, "RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders" has now been published, along with an impact analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC.
While working through the Impact Analysis I am somewhat at a loss how Option 1 and Option 3 are to be handled. In particular, going for Option 1: would the Legacy Resource lose its status: LEGACY and be relabelled to PI or PA? If this is the case, I do not see the rationale for the text in Option 3: In the latter case, however, it should be made clear that the RIPE NCC will not allow the Legacy Resource Holder to become the sponsoring LIR for its own Legacy Internet Resources. In case the status: LEGACY for Option 1 is preserved, then I can agree to the restriction as quoted. Any clarification would be appreciated. Thanks, Wilfried
On 21 Oct 2013, at 15:12, Wilfried Woeber wrote:
While working through the Impact Analysis I am somewhat at a loss how Option 1 and Option 3 are to be handled.
In particular, going for Option 1: would the Legacy Resource lose its status: LEGACY and be relabelled to PI or PA?
No.
If this is the case, I do not see the rationale for the text in Option 3:
In the latter case, however, it should be made clear that the RIPE NCC will not allow the Legacy Resource Holder to become the sponsoring LIR for its own Legacy Internet Resources.
In case the status: LEGACY for Option 1 is preserved, then I can agree to the restriction as quoted.
Any clarification would be appreciated.
There is an option, under section 1.2 (Scope) for relabelling, but then the resource in question is placed outside the scope of the proposed policy. I hope this helps. Best regards, Niall
Thanks for the clarification, so I fully support V4 of 2012-07. A big THANKS to everyone who contributed to that important project! Wilfried Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 15:12, Wilfried Woeber wrote:
While working through the Impact Analysis I am somewhat at a loss how Option 1 and Option 3 are to be handled.
In particular, going for Option 1: would the Legacy Resource lose its status: LEGACY and be relabelled to PI or PA?
No.
If this is the case, I do not see the rationale for the text in Option 3:
In the latter case, however, it should be made clear that the RIPE NCC will not allow the Legacy Resource Holder to become the sponsoring LIR for its own Legacy Internet Resources.
In case the status: LEGACY for Option 1 is preserved, then I can agree to the restriction as quoted.
Any clarification would be appreciated.
There is an option, under section 1.2 (Scope) for relabelling, but then the resource in question is placed outside the scope of the proposed policy.
I hope this helps.
Best regards, Niall
participants (2)
-
Niall O'Reilly -
Wilfried Woeber