- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Static IPv6 problem
by Jonas Byström 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

Hi, I have a problem when i try to set a Static IPv6 adress i get on my probe. I get: No more than 3 static DNS values may be used at any given time for either IPv4 or IPv6. I have set: 2001:4860:4860::8888 and 2001:4860:4860::8844 as DNS. What should i do to get this to work? Regards Jonas Byström

3 2

Re: [atlas] [ripe.net #1133019] Re: Your RIPE Atlas Probe (ID: 16784) is not connected to our network
by Daniel Suchy 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

It's surprising, that you can't manage probe remotelly when it isn't "connected" (even you can directly reach it on L3). Technically, probe runs on Linux, so you can have SSH daemon with restricted IP access running here (listenning daemon has minimal performance overhead) - by current "behavior" you simply loose any way to diagnose problem - and dependence of established tunnel is another layer, which can fail... As stated before - simple rebooting is just a *workaround* of any issue, not a solution (but it seems that's your basic recomendation). I think you should work on improvements on probe diagnostics in such cases - new hardware versions of probes seems to be more problematic compared to older probes, as I can see also on atlas mailing list. I remember, that I had to plug out/in USB flash as some step with probe before (also your recomended "solution"). Also on probe should run some kind of watchdog, which reboots probe in case of similar problem automatically - probably it doesn't run now... With regards, Daniel On 31.7.2014 17:31, Philip Homburg wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue Jul 29 19:29:20 2014, danny(a)danysek.cz wrote: >> What checks did you performed at your side before sending such email? >> You don't have any kind of "emenergency" probe management, like SSH >> shell access directly to the device? What do you see in *your* logs >> about affected probe before it was disconnected? > > The mail gets sent when the is not connected for some time. Nothing more. > > There are no open ports on the probes. The probe can only be controlled when it is connected. > > There is some evidence in the logs that there was already something wrong with the probe when it disconnected. Most likely there is something wrong with the filesystem on the USB flash drive, but that is hard to say. > > Philip >

6 6

Re: [atlas] Paris-traceroute variations
by FANOU Roderick 31 Jul '14

31 Jul '14

Hi all, Just a quick question. What is the real difference between a TCP paris-traceroutes and an UDP paris-traceroute ? How do the probes perform each of them? Thanks, Best regards, Roderick On 26.06.2014 13:13, Philip Homburg wrote: > Hi Juan, > > On 2014/06/19 16:59 , Juan Antonio Cordero Fuertes wrote: >> Not sure this is the right place to ask this... sorry if it is not. >> >> I'm trying to configure Paris-traceroute measurements, and it is not >> clear for me what is the meaning of the /paris/ parameter. In >> https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/udm/ it is said that it corresponds, for >> values from 1 to 16, to "the number of variations to be used for a Paris >> traceroute <http://www.paris-traceroute.net/>". What is this? Does it >> correspond to the number of initial probes to be used by >> paris-traceroute? I am unable to figure it out from the RIPE Atlas >> docs... any indication would be appreciated. > > Paris-traceroute tries to make sure that all packets of a traceroute > take the same route through a load balancer. This in contrast to > traditional traceroute where packets from different hops typically take > different routes when load balancers are involved. > > However, in the case of paris-traceroute it is still interesting to find > out if there are multiple routes or not. For this reason, the traceroute > measurement creates different variations that may take a different route. > > Each interval, it will try one variation. So if you select 16 variations > then it will take 16 intervals before you get back to the first one. > > Philip

2 1

Re: [atlas] [ripe.net #1133019] Re: Your RIPE Atlas Probe is not connected to our network
by Daniel Suchy 29 Jul '14

29 Jul '14

There's no firewall / ACL, anything on the way, just pure L3 device. Probe worked properly, then disconnected without any logical reason with that notification received. Probe is pingable on both IPv4 and IPv6 from outside, proper (so there's no L3 issue on the way). Probe itself resets all incoming TCP connections from my IP address located in another ASN (probably due to firewall at the probe). On traffic mirrored from the probe I see ocasional NTP queries to some servers, so "something" on probe runs. Nothing else. You do not provide any access to probe for hosts to check anything directly, so I expect you can manage fully (as this is something running any kind of Linux?). As probe has public IPv4/IPv6 address, you should not have problem reach it. Unfortunatelly, probe is located on remote datacenter with limited physical access. Also this is not a solution of problem - with reboot you probably loose anything to diagnose causes of this problem. What checks did you performed at your side before sending such email? You don't have any kind of "emenergency" probe management, like SSH shell access directly to the device? What do you see in *your* logs about affected probe before it was disconnected? With regards, Daniel On 22.7.2014 11:17, Alastair Strachan wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > Thanks for your email. > > It would appear there is something on your network blocking the probe from connecting outside your network. Could I ask you to double check to ensure there is no security/firewall rule that has been updated or needs updating to allow the probe a clean connection outside your network. > > I would also recommend trying a complete power recycle on the probe. > > Thank you for taking the time to host a RIPE Atlas probe. > > If you have any further questions, please let me know > > Kind Regards, > > Alastair Strachan > > RIPE Atlas Team > > RIPE NCC Customer Satisfaction Survey > Tell us about your customer services experience by filling out the anonymous, three-question RIPE NCC customer satisfaction > > survey:https://www.ripe.net/contact/survey/satisfaction-cs/ > >> >> On 18.7.2014 05:40, RIPE Atlas wrote: >>> Dear RIPE Atlas probe host, >>> >>> Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! >>> >>> We have noticed that your probe is not connected to our infrastructure and has been >> disconnected since 2014-07-11 03:15 UTC. Could you please check >> whether everything is set up correctly on your side? If it is, and >> your probe is still reported as disconnected when you log in at >> https://atlas.ripe.net, please reply to this email so that we can >> follow up. >>> >>> You can review the instructions for setting up your probe at >> https://atlas.ripe.net/getting-started >>> >>> If you have any questions, please contact us at atlas(a)ripe.net >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> RIPE Atlas Team >>> >>> ********** >>> You are receiving this message because you applied for or were given >> a RIPE Atlas probe. We will only send messages when your probe >> becomes disconnected for an extended period of time. >>> >> > >

1 0

Fwd: Probe 2317 (home fibre) is disconnected
by Colin Johnston 29 Jul '14

29 Jul '14

strange, connectivity seems fine to me at least within BT network range and HSO network range ? Should I reset the probe or this is a bigger monitoring probe failure ? Colin Begin forwarded message: > From: RIPE Atlas <atlas(a)ripe.net> > Subject: Probe 2317 (home fibre) is disconnected > Date: 29 July 2014 12:30:05 BST > To: colin johnston <colinj(a)mx5.org.uk> > Delivered-To: colinj(a)mx5.org.uk > Received: by 10.70.41.145 with SMTP id f17csp332256pdl; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 04:30:32 -0700 (PDT) > Received: from koko.ripe.net (koko.ripe.net. [2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1348]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f10si19194016wic.74.2014.07.29.04.30.19 for <colinj(a)mx5.org.uk> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 04:30:20 -0700 (PDT) > Received: from janus.atlas.ripe.net ([193.0.19.13]) by koko.ripe.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <atlas(a)ripe.net>) id 1XC5bZ-0004TU-Nf for colinj(a)mx5.org.uk; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:30:08 +0200 > Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=janus.atlas.ripe.net) by janus.atlas.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <atlas(a)ripe.net>) id 1XC5bZ-00004y-IA for colinj(a)mx5.org.uk; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:30:05 +0000 > X-Received: by 10.180.75.230 with SMTP id f6mr41435469wiw.5.1406633431897; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 04:30:31 -0700 (PDT) > Return-Path: <atlas(a)ripe.net> > Received-Spf: none (google.com: atlas(a)ripe.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1348; > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: atlas(a)ripe.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=atlas(a)ripe.net > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Message-Id: <20140729113005.32636.40047(a)janus.atlas.ripe.net> > X-Ripe-Spam-Level: / > X-Ripe-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: 0.4 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 4.0 DCC_CHECK Detected as bulk mail by DCC (dcc-servers.net) > X-Ripe-Signature: 407c82a9d3629e01ca957e4b84b7f67191521e4a20cb459dafae86d3fab252b9 > > Dear colin, > > Your probe 2317 has been disconnected since 2014-07-29 10:38:01 UTC. > > This is an automatically generated email from RIPE Atlas. It was sent to you because you asked to be notified if your probe becomes disconnected for more than 30 minutes. > > If you want to change this, or disable this notification altogether, please go to https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/2317/, and click the "edit" button under "Notifications". > > Kind regards, > > RIPE Atlas Team

4 6

probe selection criteria on "WW" measurements
by Paul Vlaar 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

Hi, I have two questions regarding probe selection for UDMs. When I specify for example that I want to run an ongoing measurement on 250 probes in the "WW" region, will these probes remain the same throughout the lifecycle of the measurement (unlimited) or will these be somehow randomized every time the measurement is run? Secondly, I am wondering about even spread of probe location in doing such a measurement. For instance I am as much interested in results from regions that have only a few probes, as I am interested in results from those regions that are better served. When I look at the results so far of a test measurement, it appears that I'm receiving results from 35 probes in US, but only 3 from FI and none from NO. The latter surprises me a bit since there are 100 probes reported in NO, so why aren't there any results from those coming back? While I understand that countries with more probes will likely yield more results, I am wondering if there is any method to get a better "country-balanced" result for measurements ran in "WW". Thanks, ~paul -- Paul Vlaar DNS Infrastructure Group Afilias e-mail: pvlaar(a)afilias.info phone: +1-416-673-4078 mobile: +31-6-506-306-35 mobile USA: +1-602-410-4148

5 5

Support RIPE Atlas with RIPE NCC Board
by Daniel Karrenberg 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

The RIPE NCC Executive Board is discussing RIPE Atlas as documented in the latest meeting minutes that have been published recently. https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/executive-board/minutes/2014/minutes-… The relevant part is: --------- 3.3.1 ATLAS EB286 01/04/2014 AP The Board asked Axel to produce a break down of the costs for ATLAS over a period of  3 years and an outlook beyond 2014 to see the development on OPEX and CAPEX in the coming years. Furthermore the Board asked to see a comparison between the current figures and a case where TTM and DNSMON services were continued in their current form in 2014 and beyond. Status 19/06/2014: DONE There was discussion about the value of ATLAS to the various stakeholders and the associated maintenance cost. After discussion the Board asked for clear documentation of the results of the activities so that they could review and ultimately justify the cost of the project overall. The Board discussed the ongoing cost of the ATLAS project. The Board agreed that the value of the project needed to be packaged correctly. ATLAS now has many other projects wrapped into it and the activity needed proper and concise documentation as well as a solid marketing plan moving forward. ACTION EB295: The Board asked Axel to produce a value proposition for the ATLAS service in preparation for the September meeting. --------- It looks to me that the board needs to be re-assured that RIPE Atlas is valuable enough for the membership to justify the cost. Between the lines I read basic support but a desire to hear a consistent story and success stories of benefit to the membership. Of course the RIPE NCC staff will produce an answer to the board and I will do my best to help with that. But ultimately the board is responsible to the membership. So it would be very very helpful if we could get some users of RIPE Atlas to speak up both directly to the board and to help us prepare our answer to the board. Daniel

3 2

New on RIPE Labs: Midsummer Update for RIPE Atlas
by Vesna Manojlovic 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Dear colleagues, in these hot and slow summer days, we give you an overview of the current status of RIPE Atlas, new features since the last update during RIPE68, and an insight into past and future community activities: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/fatemah_mafi/ripe-atlas-midsummer-update-2014 Regards, Vesna -- Measurements Community Building team <MCB(a)ripe.net>

2 1

some thoughts and question regrding probe "stability"
by Wilfried Woeber 22 Jul '14

22 Jul '14

Hi Folks, triggered by the discussion related to DNSMON, and an issue (power, resolved) with one of my V1 probes, I'd like to get some input or start a disussion or an investigation. To start with, I am not very clear what the term "stability" w/should mean in this context, as the probes are supposed to buffer measurment data locally, at least for a while (true?). So, here goes... Obviously, looking at some Atlas Stat pages, there are probes with a 100% uptime. Now, looking a the 3 under my supervision (2x V1, 1 Anchor), ref "Connected" and "Disconnected", there's no chance to get near that value, as all of them tend to topple over on a regular basis, mostly for a *short* period of time in the range of 0m(!) to some 30+m. With respct to the bahaviour of the Anchor, which is mounted in the same rack as the backbone router it connects to, in a Data Center, we tried to correlate the (reported) disconnection events with the router and interface logs for the probe. No luck there, also, no maint works or the like, so I presume the Anchor didn't reboot or that there were "real" network problems. Let's compare the most recent dis/connection logs for my 3 pets: ID 6009 2014-07-14 03:58:03 3d 8h 16m Still Connected 2014-05-27 03:03:54 48d 0h 46m 2014-07-14 03:50:47 0h 7m 2014-05-20 15:19:02 6d 11h 37m 2014-05-27 02:57:00 0h 6m 2014-05-14 21:16:56 5d 17h 59m 2014-05-20 15:16:22 0h 2m 2014-04-08 16:03:21 36d 5h 1m 2014-05-14 21:05:17 0h 11m ID 0466 2014-07-13 23:31:05 3d 12h 45m Still Connected 2014-07-09 23:05:40 3d 23h 54m 2014-07-13 22:59:49 0h 31m 2014-06-16 10:53:21 23d 11h 55m 2014-07-09 22:49:04 0h 16m 2014-05-25 09:03:06 22d 1h 38m 2014-06-16 10:42:00 0h 11m 2014-05-24 20:34:50 11h 54m 2014-05-25 08:29:12 0h 33m ID 0414 2014-07-07 23:41:23 9d 12h 35m Still Connected 2014-07-02 03:58:45 5d 19h 31m 2014-07-07 23:29:54 0h 11m 2014-06-13 09:37:50 18d 18h 7m 2014-07-02 03:45:08 0h 13m 2014-06-08 13:22:14 4d 20h 7m 2014-06-13 09:29:38 0h 8m 2014-05-21 08:29:23 18d 4h 45m 2014-06-08 13:15:11 0h 7m Again, I fail to see some obvious correlation, what am I missing? Does anyone else see a similar pattern? How to start debugging, if there's anythig that needs debugging? Thanks for your ideas and help! Wilfried

9 13

Actual public measurements
by Brian Rak 22 Jul '14

22 Jul '14

Is there any way to link someone to a public measurement, without requiring that they go and sign up for a RIPE account? It's an annoying extra step when I'm just trying to show someone the results of a measurement. I'm aware I could grab that raw data via the API, but then I'd have to re-implement the UI... which I don't have time for.

3 2

Questions about paris traceroute
by Thomas Holterbach 18 Jul '14

18 Jul '14

Hi all, I would like to start some Paris-traceroute measurements from RIPE Atlas probes, with a specific frequency and a control over the paris id. In particular, I am wondering if it is possible to start a traceroute measurement with all the 16 paris id at the same time. Because so far, I only find out how to start periodically a traceroute with a different paris id. I am also a little bit confused about the interval between two measurements. In the doc, it is written that the default value (900s) is the minimum, but when I create a UDM, the minimum interval seems to be 60s. I also tried 10 secondes with Restful API and the measurement started, but the real interval seems to be far upper than 10s. Can you give me more informations about this interval ? Thank you for your help, Thomas.

5 6

adding probes to UDM
by Jared Mauch 17 Jul '14

17 Jul '14

I have a few ongoing UDMs and there’s a few things that have occurred over the duration: 1) I requested 5 probes and only 3 were available (at the time). Is there a way to request the system consider more? 2) I requested 5 probes and 5 were available, but some have fallen out (and are now crossed out). I want to request 1 or 2 more to get back to the 5 threshold so I feel I have more accurate data. Are either of these possible, or do I need to stop these and create a new UDM with a larger number of probes to keep a more stable population over time? (They have been running for ~2 months so far). - jared

2 1

Three new Anchors have joined the RIPE Atlas network
by Lia Hestina 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We proudly announce three new RIPE Atlas anchors have joined the network and are now available as target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchors are called: be-anr-as2611 is hosted by MOSAIC - University of Antwerp - iMinds uk-lon-as60157 is hosted by Antheus Telecom LTD us-wct-as7922 is hosted by Comcast Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards these anchors from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Credit Usage math
by Jared Mauch 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

I am in the lucky position of earning more credits than I currently care to spend so have engaged in a bit of a 'share the wealth' campaign. (Yes, you can ask me for credits, but I am hoping something can be done to improve this as well, read on). I just sent 1 million credits to someone and now my credit "burn" rate is calculated as a large negative number. (I recently sent someone else 10x that and it caused odd math as well). It seems a few things happen: 1) E-Mail alerts go out based on credit consumption (including transfers) in past N hours. 2) Credit "earn rate" calculation includes transfers vs UDM samples. Currently I have income of almost 1M/day but shows -4k/hour due to UDM + transfer. This means when I sent 10m credits to someone, the system thought I was using 10m credits/day and emailed me a few times because it thought I would run out of credits when my UDMs gave me a few more weeks of time with my balance. I also have a large number of "small" UDMs which post quite often, so have 397 pages of the recent credit history. Are there plans to improve this display? - Jared

2 1

Local resolver for one off DNS measurement
by Rob Turner 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

Hi is it possible to perform a one off DNS A record test that uses each probes local resolver? I think this would be handy to test DNS propagation. Rob.

2 1

Solido Networks ApS has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Lia Hestina 14 Jul '14

14 Jul '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called dk-blp-as59469 and it is hosted by Solido Networks ApS in Ballerup, Denmark. Our congratulations to Solido Networks ApS! This is the first anchor in Denmark. In our announcement about last week's new anchor, there was a typo in the company name and we would like to apologise for this. The anchor, cz-prg-as2852, is hosted by CESNET, z. s. p. o. in Prague, Czech Republic. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Atlas nagios tools
by john 12 Jul '14

12 Jul '14

Hello all, i would like to introduce a tool[1] i have been developing on and off for a bit of time. its uses the atlas latest call[2] and sagan[3] to preform nagios checks based on measurement results. it supports checking a wide range of ssl, dns and http parameters which i have tried to document on github[1]. it also supports checking ping however i think it is better to use the atlas status checks[4][5] for this. The git hub repo contains some sample nagios configs which can be seen in action at https://icinga.johnbond.org/ (ripeatlas/ripeatlas). at $dayjob we dont use nagios/icinga so this is not well tested and one should expect some bugs. if you dare inspect the source you can definitely expect spelling mistakes and hacks. Thanks to Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina and Wolfgang Nagele for patches. Also thanks to Daniel Quinn and Philip Homburg for working with me integrating some changes to sagan. feedback, criticism and patches most welcome John *as http is a restricted measurement this has received little testing [1]https://github.com/b4ldr/atlas [2]https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-latest-res… [3]https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/ripe.atlas.sagan [4]https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/introducing-ripe-atla… [5]https://github.com/RIPE-Atlas-Community/ripe-atlas-community-contrib/blob…

1 0

CEZNET, z.s.p.o has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Lia Hestina 12 Jul '14

12 Jul '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called cz-prg-as2852 and it is hosted by CEZNET, z.s.p.o. in Prague, Czech Republic. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

2 1

Fwd: Deleting/editing a UDM: Not Owner
by Hendrik Visage 08 Jul '14

08 Jul '14

Good day, I'm trying to delete/stop/edit an UDM, but I get this error: Not Owner when I click on the settings tab. Screen grab: https://www.dropbox.com/s/p0u2oiboct3ut23/Screenshot%202014-07-03%2021.21.1… Any advice ideas how to do that? Thanks HEndrik

3 7

Fwd: monitoring RFC1918 IPs
by Hendrik Visage 07 Jul '14

07 Jul '14

Hi there, I'd like to monitor a couple of internal routes from one of my probes, but I get this error: Ping: Field 'target' : Measurement target "10.23.0.1" is invalid. Is that a limit somewhere? possible to relax that for probes owned/operated by me? Thanks HEndrik

4 4

How to find the correct ASN of a probe?
by Eravuchira, Steffie Jacob 07 Jul '14

07 Jul '14

Hello, The RIPE Atlas probe API [1] says that the probe with ID 14468 belongs to the ASN 6871. As per the RIPE stat API [2], the holder for ASN 6871 is PlusNet PLC,GB. I run a traceroute measurement from the same probe (Probe ID 14468) and the IP address of the second hop ICMP response is "86.4.10.1". But the RIPE stat API [2] shows that "86.4.10.1" belongs to the prefix announced by ASN 5089, NTL Virgin Media Limited,GB. Could someone tell me how I can find the correct AS which the probe belongs to? [1] https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/probe/?id=14468 [2] https://stat.ripe.net/ Kind Regards, Steffie

2 1

Probe connectivity status update interval
by Ondřej Caletka 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

Hello list, yesterday, we've deployed IPv6 in the network probe #16666 is located. The probe obtained its address via SLAAC and is world-pingable, however the Atlas system still haven't recognized the probe has IPv6 connectivity. When scheduling IPv6 UDMs for this probe, they are stuck in state "Scheduling" - see UDM #1694838 or #1694575. I guess that the system avoids scheduling IPv6 measurements to probes without IPv6 connectivity. How often is the connectivity status updated? Should we replug the probe to update its status? Cheers, Ondřej Caletka

1 0

tracing from anchor nodes
by Klaus Darilion 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hi! According to DNSMON [1] r.ns.at IPv4 is not reachable from us-bos-as11488. Are there any tools available to analyse the problem from the anchor? E.g. performing a traceroute from the respective anchor node? Thanks Klaus [1] https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/group/at.?dnsmon.session.color_range_pls=0-66…

3 3

Paris-traceroute variations
by Juan Antonio Cordero Fuertes 30 Jun '14

30 Jun '14

Not sure this is the right place to ask this... sorry if it is not. I'm trying to configure Paris-traceroute measurements, and it is not clear for me what is the meaning of the *paris* parameter. In https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/udm/ it is said that it corresponds, for values from 1 to 16, to "the number of variations to be used for a Paris traceroute <http://www.paris-traceroute.net/>". What is this? Does it correspond to the number of initial probes to be used by paris-traceroute? I am unable to figure it out from the RIPE Atlas docs... any indication would be appreciated. Thanks, Juan Antonio Cordero

5 8

IPv6 ICMP - denied packets
by Joachim Tingvold 24 Jun '14

24 Jun '14

Hi, I recently installed a probe at home, and now my router spits out loads of 'denied icmpv6'-messages. After going through the logs for the last two days, I have ~1900 entries of denies towards the probe -- all of them more or less like this (with different source); ### Jun 22 2014 22:30:22.863 CEST: %IPV6_ACL-6-ACCESSLOGDP: list ipv6-inbound/2100 denied icmpv6 2A01:4F8:130:24A4::13:76 (Po1.102) -> {PROBE-IPV6-ADDRESS} (1/4), 8 packets ### I've got an ACL applied ingress on the link to my ISP, and the relevant part is shown below; ### ipv6 access-list ipv6-inbound sequence 2000 permit icmp any any echo-reply sequence 2005 permit icmp any any echo-request sequence 2010 permit icmp any any packet-too-big sequence 2015 permit icmp any any time-exceeded sequence 2020 permit icmp any any destination-unreachable sequence 2025 permit icmp any any parameter-problem sequence 2100 deny icmp any any log-input ### This ACL conforms to RFC4890[1] (except the Mobile IPv6 part). Of the 1900 entries, all of them are ICMPv6 type 1. ~300 of them have the code bit[2] set to 1, and ~1600 of them are set to 4. These are the top sources; ### 367 2001:500:2::C 313 2001:500:2D::D 289 2A01:4F8:130:24A4::13:76 289 2001:500:3::42 196 2A01:4F8:121:30A4::78:15 161 2001:DC3::35 100 2001:7FE::53 67 2001:7FD::1 60 2001:500:2F::F ### All of these are DNS root servers (except those starting with 2A01:4F8, which are some Atlas-thingies). It seems to me that the Atlas-probe sends quite some amount of ICMPv6-packets to the root DNS-servers (and even Atlas' own boxes), that are being returned with errors. Why does the probe do this, and does it actually rely on these replies? [1] <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4890.txt> [2] <http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xml#icm…> -- Joachim

3 3

AFRINIC (MU) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called mu-plu-as327681 and it is hosted by AFRINIC in Port Louis, Mauritius. This is the third anchor hosted by an RIR on behalf of the RIPE NCC. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Selecting only anchors for UDM
by Ondřej Caletka 12 Jun '14

12 Jun '14

Hello list, is there a way to run an UDM on Anchors only? I think it would be a good feature, especially for precise latency measurement. Cheers, Ondřej Caletka

10 18

Using RIPE Atlas to Debug Network Issues
by Vesna Manojlovic 12 Jun '14

12 Jun '14

Dear colleagues, Please find the use-case for RIPE Atlas in debugging network issues, in this RIPE Labs article written by Tim Kleefass from BelWü, who is hosting a RIPE Atlas anchor. (and who holds the record for the shortest time from purchasing the anchor to it going live!) https://labs.ripe.net/Members/tim_kleefass/how-fast-the-ripe-atlas-anchor-h… Regards, Vesna

1 0

Speed tests?
by Brian Rak 11 Jun '14

11 Jun '14

Are there any plans to allow testing download speed from the probes? I guess this could cause problems for people who have the probes on metered bandwidth plans.

12 12

Lemuria Communications (US) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 10 Jun '14

10 Jun '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called us-dal-as7366 and it is hosted by Lemuria Communications in Dallas, United States. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Empty from feild
by john 06 Jun '14

06 Jun '14

Hello All, Quick question about the data format. What would cause a measurement to have an empty from field but contain data? An example would be probe_id 13663 from measurement 1672218[1]. A cursory glance seems to happens a lot more with V6 Thanks John [1]https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/measurement-latest/1672218/

3 4

NTT Communications (US, Seattle and Atlanta) have joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 06 Jun '14

06 Jun '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that two more RIPE Atlas anchors have joined the network and are now available as targets for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchors, both hosted by NTT Communications in United States, are: us-sea-as2914, in Seattle us-atl-as2914, in Atlanta Congratulations to NTT Communications for their third and forth anchor online! Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards these anchors from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

A collection of tools in Perl
by Stephane Bortzmeyer 04 Jun '14

04 Jun '14

https://github.com/pierdom/atlas-toolbox

3 2

RIPN (RU) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called ru-mow-as15835 and it is hosted by RIPN in Moscow, Russia. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Changes to the Distribution Model for RIPE Atlas Probes
by Vesna Manojlovic 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Dear colleagues, we have made some adjustments in the distribution model of RIPE Atlas probes to ensure wider topological and geographical probe coverage. Please read more in this RIPE Labs article: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/fatemah_mafi/changes-to-the-distribution-mode… Regards, Vesna

1 0

Probe not showing IPv6 ASN and subnet on map
by JC 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hi, We just setup our probe (id: 17328) and configured static IPv6 on it. Built-in measurements to IPv6 destinations seems to perform correctly from this probe. However, when we display detailed information about the probe on the coverage map https://atlas.ripe.net/results/maps/network-coverage/ we only see IPv4 information and no IPv6 subnet or ASN. Besides, searching for our IPv6 ASN (21538) in the filter field brings no results. Thanks for your help. Regards, JC

2 1

Where is "My probe" tab?
by Gilles Pion 28 May '14

28 May '14

Hello, Just received my probe today, Registered it, plugged it, all leds seem correct. I've followed the instruction on page https://atlas.ripe.net/get-involved/become-a-host/ where one can read: "Once we see that your probe is connected to the RIPE Atlas infrastructure, you'll be able to see it listed on the Public Probes page and, when you are logged in to the RIPE Atlas website, it will appear under the "My Probes" tab on that page. But, although logged on the web site I'm unable to find this "My Probes" tab on the "Public Probes" page Could someone help? -- Gilles

2 2

Bogal AB (SE) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 28 May '14

28 May '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called se-got-as50168 and it is hosted by Bogal AB in Gothenburg, Sweden. Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

Measurement creation tools and library
by Matt Calder 28 May '14

28 May '14

Hi, I'm announcing a set of Python-based command-line tools/library for measurement creation available at https://github.com/USC-NSL/ripe-atlas. Since the focus is heavily on assisting measurement creation, I think that it should compliment Sagan nicely. It has been slowly under development for a while now but still has plenty of room to grow in supporting all of the options for different measurement types. Thanks, Matt

2 1

Feature you asked for: "latest results" API
by Vesna Manojlovic 27 May '14

27 May '14

Dear RIPE Atlas community, last week we enabled a new feature that quite a few people had an interest in: an API that lets you get up to 10 most recent results of any measurement: https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/measurement-latest-api/ We wrote an article with more details: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-latest-resul… From the article: "This new feature could come in useful in a number of different situations, such as: - Creating a widget for a website that monitors a specific result in near real time, such as ping results from 100 probes around the world toward your own website - Monitoring your network by setting up an alert based on the average measurement result from the past hour - Staying aware of a major network event, such as an Internet outage in a certain region - DNS monitoring of your own domain, with configurable measurements using 10 RIPE Atlas anchors - Prototyping a script using RIPE Atlas data" Please let us know if you find other creative uses for this new API! If you develop custom code for configuring the results of this API, please share it at the GitHub RIPE Atlas Community repository: https://github.com/RIPE-Atlas-Community/ripe-atlas-community-contrib We would love to hear your success stories! Regards, Vesna

2 1

Unable to connect my probe
by Vincent Roussillat 27 May '14

27 May '14

Hello I've received my probe #16969 yesterday, registered it and tried to connect it behind my Orange Livebox here in France. It doesn't succeed to get connected and even doesn't get an IP from the DHCP server of my box (which delivers IP address to my other devices). I have tried this morning to connect it to another Internet access, at work and this failed too. Led #4 remains blinking. I can see in MyAtlas interface that the probe got connected just after the first boot, as I can see to request to DNS servers logged in the interface. May be, an upgrade began and got interrupted, leaving the probe in a strange state, I don't know... Anyway, what should I do now ? Request another probe ? Send this one back to the RIPE ? If so, where should I send it ? Regards.

2 1

Introducing: the new result parsing library (Sagan)
by dquinn 26 May '14

26 May '14

Hi everyone, in advance of the RIPE Meeting, I thought I'd let you all know about the new parsing library we've developed for use against measurement results. This was mentioned in a recent RIPE Labs article[1] but I thought it worth detailing here for those of you who aren't avid Labs followers. The idea is that you run every result you get through this handy Python library and out comes programmer-friendly Python objects. It supports the various changes in result format over time, and even does some of the heavy lifting for you like calculating ping median rtt, parsing the DNS abuf, or counting the traceroute hops. The project code is published on GitHub[2], and pull requests are welcome. Installation can be done via Pypi[3], and documentation is included in the module and available online[4] as well If you have any questions feel free to post to the list and one of us will see what we can do for you. [1] RIPE Labs article: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ripe-atlas-latest-resul… [2] Project: https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/ripe.atlas.sagan [3] Pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ripe.atlas.sagan/ [4] Documentation: https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/sagan/

3 3

RIPE Atlas use case on RIPE Labs: Evaluating new IXP peers
by Vesna Manojlovic 26 May '14

26 May '14

Dear colleagues, in this article Daniel Gomez explain how RIPE Atlas helped to evaluate new synaix's peering partners within an Internet Exchange Point and how this helped to improve customer services. Please find more details on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/daniel_gomez/basic-evaluation-of-new-ixp-peer… Kind regards, Vesna Manojlovic RIPE NCC

1 0

Atlas Latest
by john 23 May '14

23 May '14

Hi, I have been playing with the latest API over the past few days and it seems like there may be a cache in place. Is this the case? if so how long is it? Thanks John

2 2

Probe cannot connect from behind IDS/IPS with HTTPS inspection
by Ondřej Caletka 21 May '14

21 May '14

Hello list, I just observed strange behaviour of one Atlas probe. It was unable to connect to the control server from a corporate network. I suspect that some IDS/IPS appliance detects and drops probe attempt to use port 443 for non-TLS traffic*. I've tested it by trying to SSH to control server from within that network and it failed. However, normal SSH to port 22 works fine. It would be nice if the probe would be able to try more ways to reach the control server, eg. first attempt on port 443, second on port 22, third on some arbitrary high port number. I know that it would be better to put the probe in front of the firewall/IPS, but this is much more complicated in many corporate networks. *) At least it doesn't do MitM on HTTPs traffic. I've checked that too. Cheers, Ondřej Caletka

6 10

a thought about public probe page...
by Wilfried Woeber 21 May '14

21 May '14

I've got a small comments regarding the probes' overviw page at https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/ - for the country filter, top right, could the list of countries be sorted? Thanks, low prio :-) Wilfried.

1 0

Problems with DNS measurements and NSID
by Klaus Darilion 21 May '14

21 May '14

Hi! Whatever I try I fail to get the nameserver id. See measurement: https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/measurement/1666014/ But there is no NSID in the results: https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v1/measurement/1666014/result/ Am I doing something wrong, or is there a bug? Thanks Klaus

5 12

NTT Communications (US, Miami) has joined RIPE Atlas anchors
by Michela Galante 20 May '14

20 May '14

Dear RIPE Atlas users, We're happy to announce that another RIPE Atlas anchor has joined the network and is now available as a target for probe hosts conducting their own user-defined measurements. The new anchor is called us-mia-as2914 and it is hosted by NTT Communications in Miami, United States. Congratulations to NTT Communications for their second anchor online! Anchoring measurements (ping, ping6, traceroute and traceroute6) are scheduled towards this anchor from all the other anchors as well as several hundred probes, providing a continual overview of regional reachability. Results of these measurements are available as raw data in JSON format, and visualised on the map and "seismograph" with many configurable features. You can access the anchoring measurements for all anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/ Learn more about RIPE Atlas anchors at: https://atlas.ripe.net/about/anchors/ Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! Kind regards, Measurements Community Building Team RIPE NCC mcb(a)ripe.net

1 0

high volume IPs/anycasted?
by Jared Mauch 19 May '14

19 May '14

I have a few IPs on our network that are anycasted that I'd like to see the "9 limit" increased for, is there a proper way to do this? - Jared

1 0

Some UDM comments
by Jared Mauch 19 May '14

19 May '14

I'm working on creating some measurements and haven't quite moved into using the API yet and wanted to provide some feedback: 1) When creating a UDM, when it's scheduled but not yet assigned to probe(s), it would be nice to be able to increase the # of probes. 2) When creating a UDM and specifying source ASN, you can't type in that box and must use the pull-down. Related to #1, if you increase probes to (eg: 5) it resets to 1 after you select the ASN. 3) When stopping a UDM that is set for ongoing/no-end, it would be nice to have a 'stop now' vs having to pick the next 15 minute interval. In theory the system could auto-populate this. 4) I do like the probes/map/seismograph view, is it possible to provide a direct-link to these public UDMs without logging-in? (I haven't looked closely so there may be a way to do this). Trying to not need to fetch the data and generate my own graphs... 5) If I see a probe that is behaving poorly, eg: UDM 1665566 Probe# 3925, should I be providing feedback on this to others? I'm working on a Nx(N-1) measurement of these ASNs to determine which have persistent congestion that can be measured via RIPE Atlas if that is of interest to others. 174 209 701 1239 1299 2828 2914 3320 3257 3356 3491 3561 5511 6453 6461 7018 Those interested in this, I will be able to send you a list of UDMs to look at which are public. - Jared

4 4