- ripe-atlas - mailman.ripe.net

Fwd: Your RIPE Atlas Probe (ID: 24870) is not connected to our network
by Jonathan Brewer 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

Hi Team, It'd be great if you could change the tone of the alert messages below. Admit some fault. Ask for help. The majority of disconnects I've seen have been due to device failure, nothing to do with " everything is set up correctly on your side" and messages like this do nothing to encourage me or the networks I've convinced to host probes to help fix the problems. It really hurts that I've lost so many probes that took so much effort to get installed - and these messages don't help. Thanks, Jon ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: RIPE Atlas <atlas(a)ripe.net> Date: 30 October 2016 at 20:41 Subject: Your RIPE Atlas Probe (ID: 24870) is not connected to our network To: jon.brewer(a)gmail.com Dear RIPE Atlas probe host, Thank you for participating in RIPE Atlas! This is the second reminder that your probe () is not connected to our infrastructure and has been disconnected since 2016-10-09 05:44 UTC. Could you please check whether everything is set up correctly on your side? You may be able to find more information about the possible cause of the problem here: https://atlas.ripe.net/probes//#!tab-status <https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/24870/#!tab-status> If you believe everything is correctly set up and your probe is still reported as disconnected after 24 hours when you log in at https://atlas.ripe.net, please contact us at atlas(a)ripe.net Best regards, RIPE Atlas Team ********** You are receiving this message because you applied for or were given a RIPE Atlas probe. We will only send messages when your probe becomes disconnected for an extended period of time.

1 0

Probe pickup at meeting?
by Joe Provo 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

Hey, Are any $SMALLNUM probes available for pickup tonight/tomorrow? I found I only have one "to be distributed" probe left, and in a couple weeks will be taking holiday in Columbia (in current coverage voids :-). Cheers! Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / CotSG / Usenix / NANOG

2 1

Actual measurement interval much larger than planned
by Wenqin SHAO 20 Oct '16

20 Oct '16

Dear list, I encountered some cases where the actual time interval between two neighbouring measurements being much larger than the scheduled value. Have you witnessed similar cases? I appreciate explanations on underlying reasons. Here goes an example: from ripe.atlas.cousteau import AtlasResultsRequest filters = dict(msm_id=1010, probe_ids=[16981], start=1470055258, stop=1470056217) is_success, results = AtlasResultsRequest(**filters).create() if is_success: for mes in results: print mes.get('timestamp', -1) The above code requests some built-in ping measurements (240s interval) made by probe 16981 and prints their timestamps. See below for the execution result: 1470055259 1470055499 1470055978 1470056216 Four measurements are retrieved within the given time range. I noticed that time interval between the 2nd and the 3rd measurement is 479s much larger than the planned value 240s. How come? Many thanks for your attention. Best regards, wenqin

4 9

Re: [atlas] ripe-atlas Digest, Vol 62, Issue 14
by Andre Heinrichs 19 Oct '16

19 Oct '16

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:00 PM, <ripe-atlas-request(a)ripe.net> wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:24:25 +0200 > From: Philip Homburg <philip.homburg(a)ripe.net> > To: ripe-atlas(a)ripe.net > Subject: Re: [atlas] probe offline - troubleshooting requested > Message-ID: <3af3a709-9198-06d7-19a1-ae367d03a58e(a)ripe.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On 2016/10/18 7:46 , Andre Heinrichs wrote: >> Any ideas what I could try to get the probe reconnected? >> >> Just to be complete: Here are the last lines of the SOS history: >> 62.109.121.35 2016-10-18 05:43:27 A 3h 59m >> 62.109.121.35 2016-10-18 05:43:27 AAAA 3h 59m > > The best thing to try is to reflash the USB stick (i.e. connect the > probe without USB stick, wait for a out 10 minutes and insert the USB > stick). > > Unfortunately, corruption of the filesystem on the USB stick can result > in weird behavior, like your probe is showing. SOS works fine but it > doesn't connect. Just for the record: the probe works again after I did the USB fix Philip described. I'm guessing the status tab only showed the hint about Firewall trouble because that would have been another possible cause for the symptoms. Thanks, Andre

2 1

New on RIPE Labs: Orange Blacklisting: A Case for Measuring Censorship
by Mirjam Kuehne 19 Oct '16

19 Oct '16

Dear colleagues, Please find a short a article on measuring censorship on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/orange-blacklisting-a-cas… Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

1 0

probe offline - troubleshooting requested
by Andre Heinrichs 18 Oct '16

18 Oct '16

Last night my probe (#29384) was declared offline after the daily Internet disconnection my FritzBox executes to keep the provider from disconnecting me after 24 hours online. According to the SOS history the probe gets DNS requests out but somehow fails to connect completely. I tried rebooting every network component i could locally get my hands on but that didn't seem to help much. The LEDs on the probe don't actually fit any of the descriptions from the FAQ: They are On, Off, fast(er) blink (at least if compared to shortly after booting (Network Test?), On, On. I'm guessing it means the network somehow managed to fail. Although I don't notice anything missing from what I did on the network this morning. Any ideas what I could try to get the probe reconnected? Just to be complete: Here are the last lines of the SOS history: 62.109.121.35 2016-10-18 05:43:27 A 3h 59m 62.109.121.35 2016-10-18 05:43:27 AAAA 3h 59m TIA, Andre, currently not in reach of the probe

2 1

Shall we continue non-public measurements in RIPE Atlas?
by Mirjam Kuehne 18 Oct '16

18 Oct '16

Dear colleagues, "Non-public measurements" is a feature of RIPE Atlas that allows users to use the infrastructure to measure things while not sharing those results with the public. Is that still a useful feature? Should it exist in the future? For more details, see this new post on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/non-public-measurements-in-ripe-atlas Please also take the polls at the end of the article. Kind regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

1 0

Temporary Reduction of Available History on RIPE Atlas and RIPEstat
by Romeo Zwart 18 Oct '16

18 Oct '16

Dear colleagues, Today, Tuesday, 18 October 2016, between 09:00 and 10:00 UTC, the back-end storage cluster for RIPE Atlas and RIPEstat will be switched to a backup environment. This is part of planned maintenance work. The backup facility has a more limited amount of storage space, which means that RIPEstat and RIPE Atlas, including specific applications like DNSMON and DomainMon, will not serve data older than one year. We expect this to have no impact on ongoing RIPE Atlas measurements, scheduling new measurements, or the retrieval of more recent data from RIPE Atlas, RIPEstat or DNSMON. We apologise for any inconvenience. Kind regards, Romeo Zwart

1 0

Problems with f.root-servers.net in Russia?
by Marat Khalili 18 Oct '16

18 Oct '16

Sorry for slight offtopic, but does anybody know what is up with Russian instance of F root server? I observe periods of very high packet loss since 11th of October. I used to measure my own internet connectivity pinging it, but seems like by internet works better than that of the root server. Here's a measurement with 50 Russian probes, 34 of them show "Unreachable" right now: https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/6886549/#!probes -- -- With Best Regards, Marat Khalili

2 1

Out of date system probe tags
by Chris Amin 17 Oct '16

17 Oct '16

Dear all, Some of you have noticed that certain system tags (see below) remained applied to probes when they should have been removed. This is because the process that adds and removes these tags was temporarily disabled following the service issues that we experienced earlier in the month. This process has now been re-enabled after verifying that it was not a cause of the service downtime, and these tags have been applied correctly. The affected tags were: * Flaky connection * Firewall problem suspected * DNS problem suspected * No flash drive * Readonly flash drive * Hardware problem suspected Kind regards, Chris Amin RIPE NCC

1 0