Hi Michel,
I have one last question.
In the diagram below_
<image001.png>
The route on the left is marked as “Target not reached” and the one on the right is marked as “Target reached” but from both location I’m able to reach the website hosted on the target, which is the difference ?
Regards,
Roberto
Hi Michael,
thank you very much for the explanation. I made another measure using UDP and now the collected routes make more sense. I was not aware of the 5 hops without response.
Glad we spot out a particular case 😊
Regards,
Roberto
- 100.64.0.0/10 is CGN (Carrier Grade NAT), RFC 6598.
- Looking at the traceroute differently:
- Hop 1 (AS16509, Amazon EU West, Amazon-02)
- Hop 2-7 CGN
- Hop 8-9 (AS unknown, but between UK and US, IPROU3-ARIN, so Amazon IP routing 3)
- Hop 10 (AS unknown, but between UK and US, IPROU3-ARIN/ARMP-ARIN, Amazon IP routing)
- Hop 11-15 CGN
- Hop 16 (AS unknown, presumably US, IPROU3-ARIN/ARMP-ARIN, I presume Amazon IP routing still)
- Hop 17-19 CGN
- Hop 20 (AS13335, Cloudflare US)
So it seems like every cloud zone interconnect (amazon Europe west, US, then Cloudflare) transitted goes through a CGN setup. Not sure but I can understand if this confuses some types of traffic.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with your setup, but the results are interesting. I’ve copied a couple of our researchers onto the mail as they may be interested in this as well.
Michel
On 8 Feb 2023, at 11:33, roberto.lucignani@caleidos.it wrote:
Hi Michael,
for example, one measure ID is this one: 49813750
The result says there are 7 HOPS.
The result of the traceroute made directly on the host is the following one
traceroute to www.madghigno.tech (172.67.221.209), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 52.56.0.19 24.303 ms 52.56.0.31 9.067 ms 52.56.0.17 29.663 ms
2 * 100.65.18.192 7.843 ms 100.65.19.176 6.252 ms
3 100.66.8.254 1.563 ms 100.66.8.146 0.697 ms 100.66.8.168 1.449 ms
4 100.66.10.138 8.469 ms 100.66.10.14 5.713 ms 100.66.10.6 8.127 ms
5 100.66.7.77 1.653 ms 100.66.6.173 2.658 ms *
6 100.66.4.75 2.726 ms 100.66.4.87 2.327 ms 100.66.4.89 1.550 ms
7 100.65.10.65 0.533 ms 100.65.11.1 0.857 ms 100.65.10.161 8.616 ms
8 15.230.158.29 2.062 ms 15.230.158.171 5.998 ms 15.230.158.27 1.617 ms
9 15.230.158.164 1.315 ms 52.94.33.120 2.089 ms 15.230.158.40 1.484 ms
10 54.239.101.83 1.440 ms 150.222.65.23 1.358 ms 54.239.101.87 1.897 ms
11 100.91.211.7 1.368 ms 100.91.13.66 1.956 ms 100.91.13.100 5.077 ms
12 100.91.210.16 1.837 ms 100.100.6.119 1.848 ms 52.93.134.81 2.178 ms
13 100.100.73.70 2.434 ms 100.91.203.106 4.546 ms 100.100.85.70 1.139 ms
14 100.91.207.15 1.289 ms * 100.100.72.67 1.767 ms
15 100.100.2.76 3.616 ms 100.91.201.140 1.955 ms 100.91.205.18 1.744 ms
16 99.83.89.19 6.820 ms 100.91.201.1 2.454 ms 100.91.201.97 2.415 ms
17 100.91.211.89 17.823 ms 172.71.176.2 3.200 ms 172.70.160.2 4.450 ms
18 100.100.6.77 1.805 ms 100.100.6.3 1.943 ms 100.100.6.111 2.005 ms
19 100.100.80.70 1.980 ms 100.100.76.134 2.679 ms 100.100.69.134 2.081 ms
20 172.67.221.209 2.799 ms 100.100.89.209 7.318 ms 100.100.89.17 6.869 ms
Since the website is served by cloudflare the route may vary between requests but the are always around 18/20 HOPS
I don’t understand if I0m missing something here. Let me know if you need further details
Regards,
Roberto
From: Michel Stam <mstam@ripe.net>
Date: Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 10:13
To: roberto.lucignani@caleidos.it <roberto.lucignani@caleidos.it>
Subject: Re: [atlas] Measurement question
Hello Roberto,
Would you be able to share screenshots/measurement ids so we can have a look?
Regards,
Michel
On 8 Feb 2023, at 09:04, roberto.lucignani@caleidos.it wrote:
I’m doing some measurement from one of my software probes, the measure is a traceroute to a destination.
The results I get are completely different from what I see doing the same traceroute directly on host where the probe is installed. I configured the measure to sue the DNS resolution on the probe..
From the Atlas portal I get a traceroute with 7 hops, doing it directly on the host returns 28 hops, for the same destination.
Why this difference ?
Regards,
Roberto
--
Mail sent with Outlook for Mac
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete this message from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, because information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
--
ripe-atlas mailing list
ripe-atlas@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas