IPv4-only Anchors Now Supported
Dear colleagues, We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ipv4-only-ripe-atlas-anchors-now-supported?pk_campaign=labs&pk_kwd=list-atlas Regards, Robert Kisteleki RIPE NCC
Hi, On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:44:39AM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article:
Uh, what? It is not April first. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net> wrote:
We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article:
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/suzanne_taylor_muzzin/ipv4- only-ripe-atlas-anchors-now-supported?pk_campaign=labs&pk_kwd=list-atlas
I think it would be useful if the Atlas UI automatically displayed Legacy IP Only <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/legacy-ip-only.jpg> logos next to all such anchors, such that users can easily be aware of such limitations. As a long-time Atlas user, where do I file a feature request? :-)
where do i file a feature requenst for anchors with ipv6 to display "connectivity may suck?" randy
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:44:39AM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote:
We've decided to support "IPv4-only" anchors in ASNs where IPv6 is not available. You can learn more in this RIPE Labs article:
the article says "However, we will only support IPv4-only anchors hosted in ASNs that cannot announce IPv6 for technical reasons.". Could the NCC share examples (respectfully anonymized) of such _technical_ (as opposed to "technical") reasons? -Peter
Peter Koch wrote:
the article says "However, we will only support IPv4-only anchors hosted in ASNs that cannot announce IPv6 for technical reasons.". Could the NCC share examples (respectfully anonymized) of such _technical_ (as opposed to "technical") reasons?
anything in Iran probably falls into this category. There are no real technical reasons left for not supporting ipv6, only policy reasons. Nick
participants (6)
-
Gert Doering -
Lorenzo Colitti -
Nick Hilliard -
Peter Koch -
Randy Bush -
Robert Kisteleki