On Thu, 14 May 2020, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: (...)
I wish we hade a wide selection of excellent candidates. We don't. What we have is a limited set of candidates, all of which, IMHO, are likely to do a very good job if chosen. Responsibility of being RIPE chair is something that only a limited set of peole can (for personal reasons) and will want to carry.
Exactly. Now it crossed my mind it would be good if someone had the idea of nominating you. But unfortunately we're beyond that point.
I wish we had the same amount of engagement in _participating_ (as in being an active member of a group or committee) in the process as we do in criticising the output. We don't. I didn't quite see 200 ppl turn up for a seat on the NomCom.
There was the "criteria", which (at least) i failed to complain about in due time :-) (...)
I will give my feedback to the Nomcom and support my favourite candidate, and I will give the NomCom the cred the deserve.
I will do the same, and i must say i would have liked to see at least three of the NomCom members on the candidate list (which seems to be clearly incompatible...) Regards, Carlos