15 Oct
2012
15 Oct
'12
3:52 p.m.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:11:39AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
A charter needs to be suitably vague to allow for flexibility. In the
the charter also needs to be sufficiently clear to convey a general idea of overlap and distinction between the WGs, not the least because there is a finite amount of meeting slots. I'd generaly think that there ought to be a WG when there's enough (new) inetrest, but to me it is not yet clear what actual work/community building is to be done in that open source WG and Olaf's question re: DNS software, for one, is more than justified. -Peter