26 May
2020
26 May
'20
12:56 p.m.
On 26 May 2020, at 09:49, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
Jim, you then go on to quote directly from RFC7282 which says very clearly that the concerns DO need to be addressed.
Jim quoted it the wrong way around: concerns have to be addressed, but not accommodated.
Correct. You all know what I meant anyway: we already have rough consensus for the status quo. Thanks Sander.