Found some sort of a clue... (fwd)
Dear Colleagues, I do not know if you are aware of it, but this did happen already six months. I hope it would not continue to happen, because users complain that they do not receive their mail, which is misrouted for who knows what reasons to AEARN. The last story was that the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences claimed to be the "international networking body" for Bulgaria, which is of course just a funny statement. I would at least ask you to inform the .BG top level domain administration if you decide to force route the traffic somewhere. I would ask EARN once again to please not "borrow" the .BG top level domain from Internet. If you do not know what to do with the mail, simply route it to your nearest Internet gateway. Thanks! Sorry for the long Cc: list, but this problem should really be solved. Sincerely, Daniel Kalchev Forwarded message:
Subject: Found some sort of a clue... Message-Id: <JOHNSON.920923165504@maine.maine.EDU> From: Johnson@Maine.Maine.Edu (Jay Johnson) To: daniel@danbo.uucp (Daniel Kalchev) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 92 16:55:04 EDT
Apparently our mailer got an over-ride record from BITNET which directs BG traffic to AEARN. Our mailer treated my mail as subject to it and sent it to AEARN which, I guess, doesn't know how to get to danbo. The mx records are first to try forth.gr and then eu.net as I remember which seemed ok though I'd have thought the order would be reversed. So thought you'd like to know that sites which have BITNET as well as Internet links and mailers as dumb as ours may be giving grief.
I would ask EARN once again to please not "borrow" the .BG top level domain from Internet. Nothing new under the sun: long ago EARN and BITNET maintained their own set of top level domains, the names of which were naturally derived from ISO-3166 like the Internet top level domain names. Of course this caused routing and reachability problems; this was eventually solved when they were merged with the Internet top level domains, with the registration being done by / referred to the registrars of the Internet top level domains. As far as I know BITNET has been sticking to this policy ever since. But rather recently I've seen the problem show up in EARN again, in particular in the former East Block countries. So history repeats itself.... Why don't people want to learn from hard experience? Piet
participants (2)
-
daniel@digsys.bg -
Piet.Beertema@mcsun.EU.net