Yes, RIPE NCC should personally approve every person's router configurations.  Please get started on that right away.

Leslie

Sent from the road while on tour


On Oct 8, 2016 14:04, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:

Online records seem to suggest that the bogus unregistered AS47860
is and always was just a property of the one and only entity that
is providing it with route distribution, i.e. AS43659, D2 International
Investment Ukraine, Ltd.

http://1whois.ru/world/UA/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2/LLC%20%22Albino%22
(Note the abuse email address.)

Note that AS43659, D2 International Investment Ukraine, Ltd. is itself
an authorized RIPE NCC LIR:

https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/ua.d2investukraine.html

I have already written to that organization via the following two
email addresses and I have received no reply:

    support@etthua.net, d2invest@meta.ua

Could someone who actually speaks Ukranian please email these crooks and
ask them nicely to stop passing routes for unregistered IPv4 space?


Regards,
rfg


P.S.  Looking over this document:

     https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-640

It appears to me to be the case that it is possible to become a full
fledged dues-paying RIPE NCC LIR member while having never made any
sort of pledge whatsoever to refrain from announcing routes to IP space
for which the member has no clear rights, either directly, from the
relevant RIR, or indirectly from that actual registrant.  Is that
correct?

Forgive me.  Even after all this time, I'm still trying to wrap my
head around this charade, this farce.  RIPE NCC makes, creates, and
provides allocations, but then never formally asks any of its members
to respect or obey any of those.  Is that about the size of it?