But that inetnum object looks like it is just a typo. It should have been 212.3.97.0/24, which incidentally is also in the DB with the same owner. The one /24 out of 219/8 that is announced is 219.219.219.0 as listed in the Weekly Routing Report: Advertised IANA Reserved Addresses ---------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 50.0.0.0/8 9487 Handong University 91.16.23.0/24 11770 Net56 105.200.136.0/30 9768 Korea Telecom 219.219.219.0/24 2563 Seoul National University Regards, Alex -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Sascha E. Pollok [mailto:sp@iphh.net] Gesendet: Montag, 11. Dezember 2000 09:31 An: Ana Susanj; routing-wg@ripe.net Betreff: Re: RIPE NCC Region Weekly Routing Report
There's one /24 in 219/8 space? Although, it doesn't seem to be announced.
According to the list of RIRs on the APNIC's website, 219/8 is IANA-Reserved.
Looks like someone definitely put a wrong object in the db: inetnum: 219.3.97.0 - 219.3.97.255 netname: FE-NET descr: Future Electronics Ltd descr: Zaporizhzya, Ukraine country: UA admin-c: AE1363-RIPE admin-c: SB187-RIPE tech-c: IF388-RIPE rev-srv: ns.fe-club.net rev-srv: ns2.trifle.net status: ASSIGNED PA notify: hostmaster@trifle.net changed: hostmaster@trifle.net 19990913 source: RIPE Well, he is indeed not announcing that one and there is no route-object either so why don't you ripe-ncc people not just go ahead and remove it? ;-) Regards, Sascha --- Sascha E. Pollok Internet Port Hamburg Technical Manager / Network Operations Grosse Reichenstrasse 27 D-20457 Hamburg Germany Tel.�� +49 (0)40 37 49 19-0 Fax��� +49 (0)40 37 49 19-29 Email: sp@iphh.net ICQ #38955239