-----Original Message----- From: routing-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:routing-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:56 AM To: routing-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [routing-wg] discussion about rogue database objects In message <545FDE27.7030702@velea.eu>, Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis@velea.eu> wrote:
*Regarding the future process:** * I do not think it will be that easy to come up with a process. RPKI may
not be available for legacy (or independent) resources in all the regions. I think this means the RIRs will first need to speed up the deployment of RPKI for all the resources in their registries... ...
Can anyone speak to this? What resources in what registries cannot currently be covered by RPKI? If the answer is "none", then there is no problem with requiring that right now, correct? ---------------- There are actually not only technical matters, but sort to say political, law, ... As about what resources currently can't be covered by RPKI - they had already been mentioned: legacy as an example. Regards, Vladislav