Hi Marco,

Em 16/12/2019 10:28, Marco Paesani escreveu:
Marcelo,
the route  170.79.184.0/22 is not present on validator.

m.paesani@MX960-MIX-RE0# run show route 170.79.184.0/22 exact active-path

inet.0: 782165 destinations, 5177202 routes (777291 active, 0 holddown, 20504 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both

170.79.184.0/22    *[BGP/170] 3d 14:13:33, MED 500, localpref 100
                      AS path: 6762 53181 53135 I, validation-state: unknown
                    > to 93.186.128.48 via xe-8/0/3.100

The strange thing is that it is being validated elsewhere. What I do not understand is why in some it appears as valid and others as unknown when everyone should be seeing the same information. Or am I mistaken?

# whois -h whois.bgpmon.net " --roa 53135 170.79.184.0/22"
0 - Valid
------------------------
ROA Details
------------------------
Origin ASN:       AS53135
Not valid Before: 2019-12-13 19:24:16
Not valid After:  2020-12-13 19:29:16  Expires in 363d6h55m11s
Trust Anchor:     rpki-repo.registro.br
Prefixes:         170.79.184.0/22 (max length /24)

====================================================

# whois -h whois.bgpmon.net 170.79.184.0/22
% This is the BGPmon.net whois Service
% You can use this whois gateway to retrieve information
% about an IP adress or prefix
% We support both IPv4 and IPv6 address.
%
% For more information visit:
% https://portal.bgpmon.net/bgpmonapi.php

Prefix:              170.79.184.0/22
Prefix description:  Nettel Telecomunicacoes Ltda
Country code:        BR
Origin AS:           53135
Origin AS Name:      Nettel Telecomunica��es Ltda., BR
RPKI status:         ROA validation successful
First seen:          2017-03-02
Last seen:           2019-12-14
Seen by #peers:      65



 
Marco Paesani


Skype: mpaesani
Mobile: +39 348 6019349
Success depends on the right choice !
Email: marco@paesani.it





Il giorno lun 16 dic 2019 alle ore 12:54 Gondim via routing-wg <routing-wg@ripe.net> ha scritto:
Hi Matthias,

Em 16/12/2019 08:43, Matthias Waehlisch escreveu:
> [1] and [2] use different Trust Anchors.
>
> which prefix do you check?

For example 170.79.184.0/22

Other Autonomous Systems that I consulted also experienced this problem.

>
> Cheers
>   matthias
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Gondim via routing-wg wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Friday, here in Brazil, the RPKI was enabled. We have published our ROAs
>> and are being validated in several places but we found a divergence.
>> When we query our AS on this link [1] it appears to be valid but when we
>> query our AS on this link [2], it appears as unknown.
>>
>> Is there any difference between the tools that might be causing this?
>>
>> [1] http://localcert.ripe.net:8088/bgp-preview
>>
>> [2] https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/bgp-preview

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Marcelo Gondim 
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Sysadmin - https://www.linuxinfo.com.br
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   DA04 922E 78B3 44A5 3C8D 23D0 8DB5 571E E151 4E19
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere. (Albert Einstein)