Dear RIPE Routing WG Thanks for a lot of answer and comments to the survey. We will close this survey in 25th May 17:30 of the UTC time. If you could share the time for us,could you open and answer url? https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/rfd-survey We will update our draft,and let you know. Regards, -Shishio -------- Original Message -------- Subject: survey on RFD Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:42:00 +0900 From: Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com> To: routing-wg@ripe.net CC: shtsuchi@cisco.com, eof-list@ripe.net Dear RIPE Routing WG There's an internet draft that is trying to gather data on route flap damping/dampening deployment status. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-01 This work is intended to gather background data on making the feature less harmful and more usable. We would very much appreciate if you would take the time to answer the following survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/rfd-survey Thanks in advance for your time! other references: http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/grow-5.pptx http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/idr-5.pdf Regards, -Shishio
Dear RIPE Routing WG We really appreciate response to the survey. We could get 63 response from global operators groups. And we had published result of the survey as internet-draft. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02 We would like to refer the survey result to improve vender implementation. Q2.Do you use Route Flap Damping ? YES:13,NO:49 Q3.If you select No on Q2,why? Do not have the need:10 Did not know about the feature:5 No benefits expected:10 Customer would complain:5 Because I read RIPE-379:15 Other:6 Q4.If you select Yes on Q2,what parameter do you use? Default Parameter:6 RIPE-178:1 RIPE-210:0 RIPE-229:1 Other:7 Q5.Do you know Randy Bush et. al's report ''Route Flap Damping Considered Usable?'' YES:33 NO:29 Q6.IOS's max-penalty is currently limited to 20K. Do you need this limitation to be relaxed to over 50K? YES:24 NO:32 Q7.According to [draft-ymbk-rfd-usable],Suppress Threshold should be set to 6K.Do you think the default value on implementations should be changed to 6K? YES:17 NO:18 Q8.If you have any comments, please fill this box. Please see the draft. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02#se... Best Regards, -Shishio
participants (1)
-
Shishio Tsuchiya