Re: [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Arturo, When talking about the last /8 we refer to the last /8 (185/8) given by the IANA to the RIPE NCC. Please see section A of the impact analysis for policy proposal 2010-02 'Allocations from the last /8': "This proposal describes the distribution of IPv4 address space from the moment that the RIPE NCC would have to begin using the final /8 received from the IANA." http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html best regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC
On 2/7/11 2:02 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Question.
When you refer to the last /8:
Do you refer to the last /8 given to RIPE NCC by IANA? or
The last /8 stock of addresses in RIPE (generated may be by fragments from several other /8s)?
Thanks, .as
On 7 Feb 2011, at 10:43, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html#----use-of-last----for-pa-alloca...
5.6 Use of last /8 for PA Allocations <snip> • Allocations for LIRs from the last /8
On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses according to the following:
a. LIRs may only receive one allocation from this /8. The size of the allocation made under this policy will be exactly one /22.
b. LIRs receive only one /22, even if their needs justify a larger allocation. <snip>
So neither minimum or maximum I guess. But exactly a /22.
Nurani
On 7 feb 2011, at 12.38, Max Tulyev wrote:
Hi All,
so _minimum_ or _maximum_?
07.02.11 11:31, Andrea Cima написав(ла):
The minimum allocation size for this /8 has been set at /22. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAk1P9/AACgkQXOgsmPkFrjO7jQCfUgX0zng7mJ56D0o78LrJuQLZ ZssAoKwZr1j2Q9+E6xnD96AbqjxePVI2 =ZxPk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks! -as On 7 Feb 2011, at 11:47, Andrea Cima wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Arturo,
When talking about the last /8 we refer to the last /8 (185/8) given by the IANA to the RIPE NCC. Please see section A of the impact analysis for policy proposal 2010-02 'Allocations from the last /8':
"This proposal describes the distribution of IPv4 address space from the moment that the RIPE NCC would have to begin using the final /8 received from the IANA."
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html
best regards,
Andrea Cima RIPE NCC
On 2/7/11 2:02 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Question.
When you refer to the last /8:
Do you refer to the last /8 given to RIPE NCC by IANA? or
The last /8 stock of addresses in RIPE (generated may be by fragments from several other /8s)?
Thanks, .as
On 7 Feb 2011, at 10:43, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html#----use-of-last----for-pa-alloca...
5.6 Use of last /8 for PA Allocations <snip> • Allocations for LIRs from the last /8
On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses according to the following:
a. LIRs may only receive one allocation from this /8. The size of the allocation made under this policy will be exactly one /22.
b. LIRs receive only one /22, even if their needs justify a larger allocation. <snip>
So neither minimum or maximum I guess. But exactly a /22.
Nurani
On 7 feb 2011, at 12.38, Max Tulyev wrote:
Hi All,
so _minimum_ or _maximum_?
07.02.11 11:31, Andrea Cima написав(ла):
The minimum allocation size for this /8 has been set at /22. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAk1P9/AACgkQXOgsmPkFrjO7jQCfUgX0zng7mJ56D0o78LrJuQLZ ZssAoKwZr1j2Q9+E6xnD96AbqjxePVI2 =ZxPk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Andrea Cima -
Arturo Servin