On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:29, Randy Bush wrote:
then let me register my support for the issues and approaches marc raises. perhaps the system is for the benefit of operations more than the ease of registries?
randy
There are a number of operators that run their own registries (e.g. Level3, Verio, C&W, etc.). Ping Lu (formerly of C&W) was very vocal about preserving the syntax of existing RPSL attributes.
-Larry
We doesn't have a own registry, but a lot of own tools which deals with RPSL.
From my point of view I have to change both, my RPSL language parser and the interpreter. So I could not see a benefit of one solution. Personally, I would back Marks position but can not really give you a reason.
How about a acclamation at the next RIPE meeting ? Frank