Hi, On 2003-08-26 13:00:48 +0200, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Hi Joao!
We would like to request that this draft is published as a proposed standard.
That is the aim, I agree.
But, what is the procedure here? Is it still (procedurally) easy to make adjustments to the text when it has moved to PS already?
I'd expect a couple of comments, and maybe change proposals, as soon as we have implementations available and folks start to play with/use that.
I see two ways to go: - first, put the RPSLng implementation(s) into production, - get feedback, - then have the RFC or, - first have the RFC as PS - then put the implementation into production - then fix any problems with the RFC Requesting comments by preparing a prototype implementation did not really work. We have announced our prototype on 12 May 2003: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/db-wg/2003/msg00066.html No comments came so far. There is only one route6 object created (except the ones that NCC employees created for testing). In any case, I guess the community should decide how we must proceed. Best regards, -- Engin Gunduz RIPE NCC Database Group