- ripe-list - mailman.ripe.net

Verisign comments on draft “Governance Document for the Recognition, Maintenance, and Derecognition of Regional Internet Registries”
by Quesada, Christopher 24 May '25

24 May '25

Verisign appreciates the opportunity to comment on the "Governance Document for the Recognition, Maintenance, and Derecognition of RIRs" and commends its overarching goal of enhancing the resiliency and accountability of the Regional Internet Registry system through an updated Governance Document. As the Registry Operator of .com, .net, and other gTLDs, Verisign depends on the secure, stable, and reliable functioning of the RIR system. This document represents a constructive step toward formalizing a governance structure that is transparent and accountable to the broader internet community, and we offer the following feedback for the ASO AC to consider as it continues to formalize processes around the recognition, ongoing operations, and derecognition of RIRs. Our comments focus on maintaining system integrity through cautious RIR expansion, strengthening evaluation criteria, ensuring operational accountability, and clarifying rehabilitation procedures. Feedback on the RIR Governance Document Draft Verisign supports the principles articulated in Article 2, Sections 2.2 and 2.5 that each Service Region should cover a large, multinational area and that the total number of RIRs should remain small. Maintaining a small number of RIRs can help to facilitate the standardization of certain services across all RIRs in a way that supports the global IP addressing ecosystem upon which global operators depend. One key example of this is Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), a complex system of PKI, Route Origin Authorization (ROA), Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA), Route Origin Validation (ROV), BGPsec router keys, along with other objects derived from the RPKI, which requires careful coordination. If and when the recognition of new RIRs is considered under the updated Governance Document, careful consideration must be given to the potential impacts on the RPKI system. As a TLD operator that depends on consistent routing integrity and trust anchors across the global internet infrastructure, Verisign has a direct interest in ensuring that RPKI is not fragmented or weakened by inconsistent implementations across RIRs. In particular, guidance is needed to address the risks posed by the so-called "0/0 Trust Anchor" problem, which could allow a RIR to overclaim address space, undermining trust in the global RPKI system. Additionally, we strongly support the establishment of ongoing requirements, per Article 4, Section 4.1, as well as a routine audit per Article 4, Section 4.2, as both mechanisms can help ensure a high level of performance and accountability across the entire RIR system, such that it continues to support the evolving needs of the internet. We encourage the ASO AC to consider adding additional specificity to Article 3 regarding the Recognition of Candidate RIRs. Several of the criterion in the current draft are worded somewhat ambiguously, which may pose challenges for the existing RIRs and ICANN to evaluate applications from Candidate RIRs in the future. As an example, the ASO AC could consider setting specific thresholds for criteria such as demonstrating that Resource Holders in a Candidate RIR's proposed Service Region "broadly support" the Candidate, by requiring support from at least 75% of the Resource Holders in the proposed Service Region. In addition, transparency into how such thresholds are measured and verified, through publishing evaluation reports or summaries would improve community confidence in the process and reduce the risk of perceived inconsistency. Due to the critical function that each RIR and the RIR system plays in the DNS and the broader internet, it is vital that the criteria to both establish and continually operate an RIR be set at an appropriately high level. To that end, we suggest that Article 3, Section 3.1 incorporate a requirement for Candidate RIRs to submit a formal business plan that would demonstrate its financial sustainability, operational readiness, and long-term viability. The ASO AC may also consider adding requirements for qualified third parties to assess the Capability and Impact criteria for recognition outlined in sections 3.1.d and 3.1.e according to clear and objective metrics. Finally, to further strengthen governance, we recommend that the ASO AC provide greater detail on the Rehabilitation process referenced in Article 5, Section 5.1. The ASO AC could consider doing this in either this Governance Document or separate document focused on the implementation details of operational requirements. In the event of an RIR's non-compliance with the Governance Document, the broader RIR system would benefit from additional clarity on how compliant RIRs are expected to support the noncompliant RIR and how critical services will be maintained during such periods. Conclusion Verisign appreciates the work that has gone into developing this draft Governance Document and supports the broader goal of reinforcing the governance framework for the RIR system as a critical component of global internet infrastructure. We look forward to future iterations of this important document. Verisign's recommendations are intended to help preserve system stability, promote clear and consistent standards, and ensure accountability through well-defined oversight mechanisms.

1 0

Survey on Filtering of TCP Options in the Internet
by Fahad Hilal 23 May '25

23 May '25

Dear RIPE community, We at the Max Planck Institute for Informatik (Germany) and LIX, Ecole Polytechnique (France) have been performing measurements to understand how TCP options/features are processed by routers along the path (see our previous work [1]). We want to confront network operators' views with our observations. To this end, we propose this short survey [2] to operators and would really appreciate if you could complete it. Please note that you are free to answer only the questions you feel comfortable with. Your input will be used anonymously and will not be connected to your AS. We look forward to your input. [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3595290 [2] https://nextcloud.mpi-inf.mpg.de/index.php/apps/forms/s/WS4cscFcASZabpm2bax… Best regards, Fahad Hilal MPI-INF

1 0

The RIPE Chair Reports - Hightlights from RIPE 90
by Mirjam Kühne 23 May '25

23 May '25

Dear colleagues, In this new update on RIPE Labs, we take a quick look back at the RIPE 90 meeting. We highlight some of the common themes that emerged through the course of the week, such as resilience and diversity. We also cover the DEI session where the focus this time was on accessibility, newcomers and mentoring, and how to make everyone feel welcome and included. Finally, we welcome new WG co-chairs and PC members and highlight other ongoing governance topics such as the RIPE NomCom and the draft document on RIR Governance. You can read the full article here: https://labs.ripe.net/author/mirjam_kuhne/the-ripe-chair-team-reports-highl… Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne and Niall O'Reilly RIPE Chair and RIPE Vice-Chair

1 0

Statement on Legal Threats
by Hans Petter Holen 17 May '25

17 May '25

Dear Lu, all, We would like to respond to the statements you have made, here on the RIPE mailing list and at our General Meeting which took place on Wednesday. You commented that a lawsuit “could potentially cost millions”, and that we could "get out of this pretty easily" by allowing Internet number portability. For the record, the lawsuit you have threatened regards our decision not to accept sponsorship from you for the RIPE 90 Meeting. Of course, we disagree with the statements you have made. And we make the following statement in reply. The RIRs play a crucial role in ensuring the uniqueness of Internet number resources, which is essential for ensuring the operation and stability of the Internet. This role requires an authoritative source to prevent conflicts and overlaps in address allocations. In filling this role for our region as the RIPE NCC we make great efforts to maintain robust corporate governance with high levels of transparency. The RIR system has been developed by the technical community over more than three decades, through a process of open, transparent and bottom-up dialogue and policy development. Any significant changes to this system or the way we operate should be worked out through this well-established community process. We would also like to clarify that IP addresses are not property. This is reflected in the RIPE NCC Standard Service Agreement: “10.2 The Member acknowledges and agrees that the registration of Internet Number Resources does not constitute property and the registration of Internet Number Resources in the name of the Member or a third party does not confer upon the Member or the third party any rights of ownership. The Member acknowledges that any Internet Number Resources deregistered by the RIPE NCC may be re-registered to another party according to the RIPE Policies.” Let us be very clear - we stand behind doing the right thing for our members and community. A public statement was made that a legal threat regarding event sponsorship will go away if the RIR system accommodates someone’s personal interests. We believe that this legal threat is made without any solid basis and is intended merely to force the hand of the RIPE NCC in an aggressive manner. We suggest that if you believe the RIRs should implement number resource portability in a way that is not currently allowed by the existing policies, then you should follow the existing and well-established community policy processes that have allowed the RIRs to operate for many years in service to the wishes of their respective communities. Regards, Hans Petter Holen Managing Director, CEO RIPE NCC

3 2

Re: Antitrust investigation into RIPE NCC may expose members to tens of millions in potential legal costs for defending actions that violate members’ rights.
by Lu Heng 16 May '25

16 May '25

Hi Alex: The assertion that I have manufactured this issue, rather than acknowledging it as a serious matter requiring attention from RIPE NCC and the RIPE community, represents a fundamentally flawed approach. Nonetheless, in the interest of complete community transparency, I will address your question below. -- Kind regards. Lu On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 16:06 Alex de Joode <adejoode(a)idgara.nl> wrote: > Hi Lu, > > Thanks for your entertaining performance at the GM. > > I'm grateful for the mail below. Please allow me to share a few comments > with you and the community: > > selection of lawfirm: Loyens & Loeff is a well regarded tax law firm, > however their Competition Law department is only Band3/4 on the Chambers > Ranking so would it be correct for me to surmise the top-tier Competition > Law firms in The Netherlands declined to respresent you (for instance due > to lack of substance of your claim)? > Attacking the person not the merit? Also your assumption is simply factually wrong, no law firm have declined the case due to lack of substance. But Full transparency from my internal legal team send to me as I equire, and yes, we had “higher band” law firm actually sent the letter to RIPE, but we find Loyens & Loeff simply more capable: “Dear Mr. Lu, 1) Respectfully, the band rankings of law firms, such as those by Chambers&Partners or Legal 500, are not entirely objective. While these platforms claim that their rankings are free, nominations often require a fee, including in Malaysia. In practice, they function more as branding/marketing tools rather than genuine merit-based assessments. For example, the first lawyer we spoke with, and sent our first letter to RIPE NCC, Bird&Bird Law firm, is ranked Band 2 for EU Competition by Legal 500. However, based on our experience, we found her approach lacking in both capability and ability in handling instructions. 2) Given that RIPE is based in the Netherlands, it is most appropriate to engage a Dutch law firm, both for jurisdictional and geographical reasons for the summons to issue. This ensures that we can seek remedies not just under EU competition law, but also under Dutch tort law, where relevant. In this context, Marc and the firm Loyens & Loeff were mentioned a couple times when we are sourcing. He was recommended by many other EU lawyers in their emails as working partners in the Amsterdam when realising RIPE is in Amsterdam. (screenshots below) Ultimately, the quality of service depends more on the individual lawyer than the firm. (i) Marc has showed expertise and experience, as well as a willingness to understand and accommodate our concerns. (ii) Hence, Marc can be said to be truly and well recognised in the eyes of other EU lawyers and he has the capability to sort this out. Hope that explains.” > internally incoherent argumentation: you state all 5 RIR's fall under the > EU Competition Law, however if that is the case how can RIPE have a > monopoly (there is choice then)? > We will publish full review report in due course for community to view. For clarity, below are the member rights I previously shared in the Telegram group to avoid anti trust claims—particularly since the RIPE Board appears to dismiss the legitimacy of those discussions, labeling them as “unofficial.” Summary of Key Rights and Their Importance: • Portability of IP Addresses: Members can move their IP allocations to another provider or registry if needed, similar to phone number portability. This prevents lock-in and ensures RIRs cannot trap members in an unfair situation, addressing monopoly concerns directly. • Transferability and Ownership Rights: Members may transfer or sell addresses under transparent rules. This creates an open market for IP resources and avoids RIR over-control. Members retain value in their addresses, and supply can meet demand without RIR interference, reducing incentives for antitrust claims . • Equal Access (Non-Discrimination): All qualifying members receive services on equal terms – no favoritism or unjust exclusions. This upholds neutrality. With open membership and uniform policies, RIRs demonstrate they aren’t picking winners or reinforcing dominance of any one player. • Due Process in Sanctions: Clear procedures for any resource revocation or membership closure, including notice and chance to remedy. This fairness in enforcement shows that any resource reclamation is policy-driven, not arbitrary. It prevents scenarios where a member feels wronged without being heard, which often lead to lawsuits. • Appeal and Conflict Resolution: Mechanisms (arbitration, appeals committee) for independent review of RIR decisions. This gives members confidence that they can challenge decisions internally. It helps resolve disputes amicably and demonstrates accountability, making regulatory intervention less necessary. • Transparency and Accountability: Open publication of registries, policies, and decision-making processes, plus member governance of the RIR. This sunlight deters anti-competitive behavior and ensures community oversight. An RIR that is transparent about its actions is far less likely to be accused of conspiratorial or abusive conduct. > As you are well aware law firms add loads of disclaimers to their > opinions, but these are not listed below. Would you be so kind as the share > the whole opinion, so the wider community can also see the disclaimers the > law firm wrote in the opinion and come to a better appriciation of your > claim? > Nope, what I posted is the entirety of their email, with header I omitted in which I am going to share here: Dear all, As agreed yesterday, please find below some speaker notes that could be used by Mr. Lu at the RIPE NCC conference. Please have a close look if the proposed argumentation correctly reflects your thoughts as to why the decisions of RIPE NCC may restrict competition. Since we have successfully completed the KYC process, please feel free to refer to the name of Loyens & Loeff as your advisors in this matter. Please note, however, that our comments are still of a rather general nature at this stage because we have not yet been able to do any profound research or in depth analysis on this matter. > Thanks, > Alex > -- > IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex(a)idgara.nl | +31651108221 > > On Thu, 15-05-2025 8h 21min, Lu Heng <h.lu(a)anytimechinese.com> wrote: > > *Hi colleagues:* > > > *Below are finding from law firm:* > > > *RIPE NCC qualifies as an association of undertakings in the sense of EU > competition law. In view of its activities, such as the allocation and > registration of Internet number resources, RIPE NCC itself may also be > regarded as an undertaking under EU competition law. The same applies to > the other four regional Internet registries (RIRs). It follows that RIPE > NCC is obliged to act in line with EU competition law: * > > > > - *as an association of undertakings, it must comply with Article > 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which > prohibits decisions by associations of undertakings which may affect trade > between Member States and which have as their object or effect the > prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal > market of the European Union. This is also known as the cartel prohibition;* > - *as an undertaking, it must comply with Article 101(1) TFEU, which > also prohibits agreements between undertakings which may affect trade > between Member States and which have as their object or effect the > prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal > market of the European Union;* > - *as an undertaking, it must also comply with Article 102 TFEU, which > prohibits the abuse of a dominant position within the internal market of > the European Union.* > > > > *As regards the applicability of this Article 102 TFEU to RIPE NCC, it is > important to note that the current standard service agreement of RIPE NCC, > as well as the proposed new model, in conjunction with the RIR Governance > Document, grants RIPE NCC complete territorial exclusivity to allocate and > register Internet number resources in its own service area. Consequently, > RIPE NCC holds a monopoly in its service area and should therefore be > considered subject to the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position as > set out in Article 102 TFEU.* > > > > *We have been advised by Loyens & Loeff that several restrictions in the > current and the proposed service agreement of RIPE NCC and the RIR > Governance Document may raise concerns under EU competition law, and could > be contrary to the cartel prohibition and/or the prohibition of abuse of > dominance.* > > > > *Firstly, the allocation of exclusive territorial service areas to each of > the five RIRs could possibly be interpreted as a market sharing agreement. > In general, market sharing agreements are considered to constitute serious > hard core infringements of the cartel prohibition. These types of > agreements only very rarely escape the applicability of the cartel > prohibition, and usually do not qualify for an exemption from this > prohibition.* > > > > *In addition, the current and the proposed service agreement of RIPE NCC > excludes the portability of rights to number resources. The fact that these > rights are not portable is likely to restrict potential competitors of RIPE > NCC (both existing RIRs as well as companies desirous to become RIRs) to > offer their services to users in RIPE NCC’s service area. Therefore, to the > extent that the current and proposed regime does not allow for number > portability, this could be regarded as a decision of an association of > undertakings which is contrary to the cartel prohibition, as well as an > abuse of RIPE NCC’s dominant position in its service area.* > > > > *The consequences of an infringement of the cartel prohibition or of an > abuse of a dominant position can be extremely severe. Perhaps most > importantly:* > > > > - *the European Commission may impose very high fines, which may go up > to 10% of the worldwide annual group turnover;* > - *parties that have suffered damages as a result of the infringement > of EU competition law, may ask for compensation of these damages in civil > court proceedings.* > > > > *** > > > > We hope the above is helpful. Happy to discuss. > > > > > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > ----- > To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, > please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/ripe-list.ripe.net/ > As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with > the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. > More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/ > >

3 2

RIPE 90 Highlights and Thank You!
by Mirjam Kühne 16 May '25

16 May '25

Dear all, RIPE 90 ended with a total of 648 attendees checked in onsite in Lisbon and 172 checked in online across the meeting week, with more joining in via the livestream and YouTube. Thank you all for making this RIPE Meeting such a success! We were happy to see active participation at this meeting from both online and onsite participants. We would like to thank all the speakers, Working Group Chairs, the Programme Committee, the Code of Conduct Team and our sponsors for their contributions. Over the past week, we have had many exciting plenary sessions, lightning talks, Working Group sessions, BoFs and social events. You can find the highlights from each day in the Daily Meeting Blog at: https://ripe90.ripe.net/programme/blog/ All presentations from the meeting are archived: https://ripe90.ripe.net/presentation-archive/ You can already register for RIPE 91, taking place in Bucharest, Romania from 20-24 October 2025. The call for presentations will open in the coming weeks, so keep an eye out for the announcement! You can get updates via the RIPE Discussion list, social media and the RIPE 91 website: https://ripe91.ripe.net Best regards, Mirjam Kühne, RIPE Chair, and Niall O’Reilly, RIPE Vice-Chair

1 0

Register Now for RIPE 91!
by Meeting Mailbox 16 May '25

16 May '25

Dear colleagues, You can now register for the RIPE 91 Meeting at: https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/attendee-info/register/ RIPE 91 will take place at the JW Marriott Bucharest Grand Hotel <https://www.marriott.com/en-us/hotels/buhro-jw-marriott-bucharest-grand-hot…> , Romania, from 20-24 October 2025. ------------------- Ticket Options ------------------- Week ticket: € 400 (Early Bird €350) Day ticket: €130 (Early Bird €125) Student (week) ticket: € 50 Dinner Ticket: € 75 The early bird rate is available until 21 July 2025. You can find more information about ticket options at: https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/attendee-info/register/ ---------------------------- Call for Presentations ---------------------------- Call for Presentations will open on 4 June. The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) will be seeking content proposals from the RIPE community for the plenary sessions, BoFs (Birds of Feather sessions), workshops, tutorials and lightning talks. Proposals must be submitted for full consideration no later than 31 July. The deadline to submit lightning talks is 6 October. Please check back later for more information at: https://ripe91.ripe.net/present/call-for-presentations/ ---------------------- Call for Sponsors ----------------------- Supporting a RIPE Meeting through sponsorship gives your organisation fantastic exposure in the global Internet community. Get in touch with the RIPE Meeting team if you are interested in sponsoring RIPE 91: https://ripe91.ripe.net/about/sponsors/ --------------- Local Hubs --------------- Not everyone can travel to Bucharest to attend RIPE 91 in person. Want to help bring the RIPE community together in your area? Host a Local Hub! https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/local-hubs/ -------- RACI --------- The RIPE Academic Cooperation Initiative (RACI) covers the cost of the meeting ticket, travel and accommodation for successful applicants to present their research at RIPE 91. Apply before 21 July at: https://www.ripe.net/community/community-initiatives/raci/ ------------------------------ Mentoring Programme ----------------------------- The RIPE Meeting Mentoring Programme connects newcomers with experienced members of the community. RIPE Meetings have brought people together for over 25 years to talk about Internet operations, policy, and governance. As the community grows, we want everyone to feel welcome and involved—no matter their skills or experience. Want to be a mentor or find one? For more information about how to become a mentor or be paired with a mentor, visit: https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/on-site/mentoring-programme/ --------------------- Accommodation --------------------- Due to the limited number of rooms available, please book your accommodation soon: https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/on-site/accommodation/ ----------------------- On-site Childcare ------------------------ We're making it easier for parents to fully participate in the RIPE Meeting by offering professional, on-site childcare for children aged 6 months to 10 years. Space is limited, so be sure to register before 15 September to confirm. For more information, visit: https://ripe91.ripe.net/attend/on-site/childcare/ ----------------------------------------- Important Dates and Deadlines ----------------------------------------- 16 May: Registration opens 16 May: Call for applications for RACI opens 16 May: Call for Local Hubs opens 4 June: Call for Presentations opens 21 July: Deadline for Early Bird registration 21 July: RACI application deadline 31 July: Deadline to submit a talk 15 Sept: Mentoring application deadline 15 Sept: Local Hub application deadline 15 Sept: Childcare application deadline 26 Sept: Sponsorship deadline 29 Sept: Final programme published 06 Oct: Lightning Talk submissions accepted 10 Oct: Deadline to send recorded presentations to be published on the website 20 Oct – 24 Oct: RIPE 91 takes place in Bucharest More information about RIPE 91 can be found at: https://ripe91.ripe.net/ Track the #RIPE91 hashtag on social media for the latest updates. See you in Bucharest! Kind Regards, The Meeting Organisation Team

1 0

Antitrust investigation into RIPE NCC may expose members to tens of millions in potential legal costs for defending actions that violate members’ rights.
by Lu Heng 15 May '25

15 May '25

*Hi colleagues:* *Below are finding from law firm:* *RIPE NCC qualifies as an association of undertakings in the sense of EU competition law. In view of its activities, such as the allocation and registration of Internet number resources, RIPE NCC itself may also be regarded as an undertaking under EU competition law. The same applies to the other four regional Internet registries (RIRs). It follows that RIPE NCC is obliged to act in line with EU competition law: * - *as an association of undertakings, it must comply with Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which prohibits decisions by associations of undertakings which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal market of the European Union. This is also known as the cartel prohibition;* - *as an undertaking, it must comply with Article 101(1) TFEU, which also prohibits agreements between undertakings which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the internal market of the European Union;* - *as an undertaking, it must also comply with Article 102 TFEU, which prohibits the abuse of a dominant position within the internal market of the European Union.* *As regards the applicability of this Article 102 TFEU to RIPE NCC, it is important to note that the current standard service agreement of RIPE NCC, as well as the proposed new model, in conjunction with the RIR Governance Document, grants RIPE NCC complete territorial exclusivity to allocate and register Internet number resources in its own service area. Consequently, RIPE NCC holds a monopoly in its service area and should therefore be considered subject to the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position as set out in Article 102 TFEU.* *We have been advised by Loyens & Loeff that several restrictions in the current and the proposed service agreement of RIPE NCC and the RIR Governance Document may raise concerns under EU competition law, and could be contrary to the cartel prohibition and/or the prohibition of abuse of dominance.* *Firstly, the allocation of exclusive territorial service areas to each of the five RIRs could possibly be interpreted as a market sharing agreement. In general, market sharing agreements are considered to constitute serious hard core infringements of the cartel prohibition. These types of agreements only very rarely escape the applicability of the cartel prohibition, and usually do not qualify for an exemption from this prohibition.* *In addition, the current and the proposed service agreement of RIPE NCC excludes the portability of rights to number resources. The fact that these rights are not portable is likely to restrict potential competitors of RIPE NCC (both existing RIRs as well as companies desirous to become RIRs) to offer their services to users in RIPE NCC’s service area. Therefore, to the extent that the current and proposed regime does not allow for number portability, this could be regarded as a decision of an association of undertakings which is contrary to the cartel prohibition, as well as an abuse of RIPE NCC’s dominant position in its service area.* *The consequences of an infringement of the cartel prohibition or of an abuse of a dominant position can be extremely severe. Perhaps most importantly:* - *the European Commission may impose very high fines, which may go up to 10% of the worldwide annual group turnover;* - *parties that have suffered damages as a result of the infringement of EU competition law, may ask for compensation of these damages in civil court proceedings.* *** We hope the above is helpful. Happy to discuss. -- Kind regards. Lu

2 1

The RIPE Chair Team Reports - March 2025
by Mirjam Kuehne 14 May '25

14 May '25

Dear colleagues, In this new update we report on preparations for RIPE 90 and other topics and events that keep the community busy this month: https://labs.ripe.net/author/mirjam_kuhne/the-ripe-chair-team-reports-march… Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE Chair

7 6

ASO AC Selects Christian Kaufmann to Serve in Seat 10 of the ICANN Board of Directors
by Ulka Athale 13 May '25

13 May '25

This message is sent on behalf of the Address Supporting Organization. ----------------------- The announcement is available at: https://aso.icann.org/aso-ac-selects-christian-kaufmann-to-serve-in-seat-10… ----------------------- The ASO AC is pleased to announce that it has selected Christian Kaufmann to serve for a three-year term in Seat 10 of the ICANN Board of Directors. Mr. Kaufmann is the ASO AC’s current appointee to Seat 10. His current term will end in October 2025 and his new term will begin at the conclusion of ICANN 84, which will take place from 25-30 October 2025, in Muscat, Oman. More information about Mr. Kaufmann is available at: https://www.icann.org/en/board/directors ----------------------- Acknowledgement ----------------------- The ASO AC would like to thank Mr. Kaufmann for his dedicated service on the ICANN Board over the past three years. ----------------------- Selection Process ----------------------- Mr. Kaufmann appointment is the result of a lengthy selection process, which included a public call for nominations, a public comment period, written and video interviews. Full details of the election process, including election results and information on all candidates, can be found on the 2025 ASO AC ICANN Board Seat 10 Elections page at: https://aso.icann.org/icann-board/icann-board-elections/2025-icann-board-of… Regards, The ASO Secretariat -- Kind regards, Ulka Athale RIPE NCC www.ripe.net

1 0